San Francisco Office
publications
LawFlash/Client Alert | Labor and Employment LawFlash
Labor and Employment Practice
In a case that will be of interest to any company that employs unlicensed accountants, including professional accounting firms, the U.S. District Court for Eastern District of California under Judge Lawrence K. Karlton granted ... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Litigation LawFlash
John Lavelle, Jr., David Schrader, Kathleen Waters
On January 21, the California Supreme Court declined to review the decision issued by the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District in Conte v. Wyeth (Case Nos. A116707, A117353; Cali... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Labor and Employment LawFlash
Labor and Employment Practice
On December 10, the California Court of Appeal granted summary judgment in favor of Starbucks Corporation, finding that plaintiffs seeking to represent a potential class of 135,000 job applicants failed to show... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Labor and Employment LawFlash
Labor and Employment Practice
In a case with potentially far-reaching implications for California and non-California employers alike— Sullivan v. Oracle Corporation , 08 C.D.O.S. 13881 (9th Cir. Nov. 6, 2008)—the Ninth Circuit hel... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Employee Benefits LawFlash
Employee Benefits Practice
In August 2006, San Francisco’s mayor signed into law the San Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance (the ordinance). The ordinance requires certain employers operating with the geographic limits of the... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Labor and Employment LawFlash
Labor and Employment Practice
On September 30, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Assembly Bill 10 (AB 10), which clarifies California Labor Code section 515.5’s exemption for computer professionals paid on a salaried basis.
In ad... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Labor and Employment LawFlash
Labor and Employment Practice
In Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP , the California Supreme Court has confirmed that even limited noncompetition agreements are not enforceable in California. The Supreme Court also held that release agr... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Labor and Employment LawFlash
Labor and Employment Practice
In a case that may have far-reaching and positive implications for both California employers and employees, the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District held that (1) employers need not ensu... more
Presentation | Speech
Andrew Ruskin
Presentation | Speech
Phoebe Mounts
LawFlash/Client Alert | Labor and Employment LawFlash
Labor and Employment
In August 2006, San Francisco’s mayor signed into law the San Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance (HCSO). The HCSO requires certain employers operating with the geographic limits of the City and Coun... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Labor and Employment LawFlash
Labor and Employment
Shortly after the November 7, 2006 election, we reported on “Measure F,” which was approved by more than 60% of San Francisco, California residents. Measure F enacted a “Sick Leave Ordinance” (the Ordinance) that require... more
Presentation | Speech
John Ayanian
Presentation | Speech
Scott Karchmer, Heather Brookfield, Zaitun Poonja
Presentation | Webinar
Michael Ossip, Karen Peteros, Sarah Bouchard
Presentation | Speech
Joan Haratani
Presentation | Speech
Joan Haratani
Presentation | Speech
Stephanie Blair
Presentation | Speech
Joan Haratani
Presentation | Speech
Patrick Ryan