Seventh Circuit “Disapproves” of Gartenberg Factors

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently cast some uncertainty over the long-standing factors that fund directors use to determine the proper level of an adviser’s fees as set forth in Gartenberg v. Merrill Lynch. The court affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of a complaint against Harris Associates, the adviser to the Oakmark family of mutual funds. In support of a claim under Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the plaintiffs argued that, because the funds paid a higher fee than the adviser’s institutional accounts for allegedly similar services, the funds’ fees could not have been the result of arm’s-length bargaining. While the Seventh Circuit agreed with the lower court’s dismissal of this claim, it is unclear how this decision will affect the treatment of Gartenberg by other courts.

For the full story, please view the PDF.