For More Information
-
Michael F. Clayton
Partner - Washington, D.C.
Related Publications
Related News
LawFlash/Client Alert | Intellectual Property LawFlash
Michael Clayton, J. Kevin Fee, Karen Butcher
Brand owner's broad covenant not to sue may render invalidity counterclaims moot.
Outside Publication | Article
Rochelle Alpert
Outside Publication | Article
Brett Lovejoy, Ph.D., Carla Oakley
Reprinted with permission from the October 19, 2012 issue of The Recorder. (c)2012 ALM Media Properties LLC. Further duplication without permission is prohibited. All Rights Reserved. Product designs that capture the ... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Intellectual Property LawFlash
Jordana Rubel, Karen Butcher
Bill allowing owners of innovative fashion designs to enforce their rights against "substantially identical" designs includes notice requirement and 21-day grace period.
LawFlash/Client Alert | Intellectual Property LawFlash
Michael Clayton, Ron Dreben, Karen Butcher
Release of list is an important step toward what likely will be a dramatic change to the Internet; interested parties have until August 12 to submit comments.
Outside Publication | Article
Henry Horbaczewski
Outside Publication | Article
Henry Horbaczewski
Outside Publication | Article
Henry Horbaczewski
LawFlash/Client Alert | Intellectual Property LawFlash
Dana Gross
After years of online and offline discussions, international meetings, and many versions of proposed controlling documents, in June 2011 ICANN (described below) voted to allow up to 1,000 new top-level domains (TLDs) on the Inte... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Intellectual Property LawFlash
Intellectual Property Practice
In Levi Strauss & Co. v. Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. , No. 09-16322 (Feb. 8, 2011), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit provides guidance on an important issue for trademark owners in assessing dilutio... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Intellectual Property LawFlash
Intellectual Property Practice
The Federal Circuit recently issued a decision that will be of interest to any business hoping to register a mark used online to promote and sell a product, and anyone who does U.S. trademark prosecution and maintenance work, pa... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Intellectual Property LawFlash
Intellectual Property Practice
In a long-awaited decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit clarified the fraud standard yesterday, holding that "a trademark [registration] is obtained fraudulently under the Lanham Act only if the applicant o... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Intellectual Property LawFlash
Intellectual Property Practice
On August 17, the California Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Christoff v. Nestlé USA, Inc. that right of publicity claims are subject to the single publication rule. But the court left for another day determination ... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Intellectual Property LawFlash
Rochelle Alpert, Karen Butcher
In the Second Circuit decision in JA Apparel Corp. v. Abboud , 08-3181-cv (June 10, 2009), the court provides guidance to purchasers of trademark rights consisting of a person's name as to the scope of the agreement that would ... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Intellectual Property LawFlash
Dana Gross
As has been broadly reported, the popular social networking website Facebook announced this week that at 12:01 a.m. Saturday, June 13, it will begin allowing users to register new, "personalized" Uniform Resource Locators (URLs)... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Intellectual Property LawFlash
Intellectual Property Practice
Individuals and companies that are the subject of negative, anonymous online postings often face challenges when attempting to address such problematic messages in the United States. When such postings occur, the First Amendmen... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Intellectual Property LawFlash
Intellectual Property Practice
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia yesterday issued an order permanently enjoining the implementation and enforcement of the new rules from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) related to claim... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Intellectual Property LawFlash
Intellectual Property
On August 1, 2007, final changes to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Rules were published in the Federal Register. The critical rule changes go into effect on November 1, 2007. T... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Intellectual Property LawFlash
Intellectual Property
On August 21, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published the long-awaited new rules related to continuation filings and examination of claims. As expected, the new rules limit the number of continuation app... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Intellectual Property LawFlash
Intellectual Property
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the Board) has continued its unwavering focus on fraud with a precedential decision in Hachette Filipacchi Presse v. Elle Belle, LLC , Cancellation No. 92052991 (April 9, 2007). The Board ... more
LawFlash/Client Alert | Intellectual Property LawFlash
Intellectual Property
The ongoing controversy over the legality of using trademarks to generate online keyword advertisements or “sponsored links” has a new twist. Last month, the State of Utah knocked loudly on the Internet’s door with a controvers... more
Outside Publication | Article
William Colgin, Jr., Karen Butcher
Outside Publication | Article
Ron Dreben
Presentation | Speech
James Sims III
Presentation | Speech
Michael Clayton
