Worldwide Locations
Related News
Office Contacts
- Franklin Brockway Gowdy Managing Partner
- Howard Holderness Hiring Partner
- Jennifer Anker Kaufman Attorney Recruiting
Presentation | Speech
Phoebe Mounts
LawFlash/Client Alert | Labor and Employment LawFlash
Labor and Employment
Shortly after the November 7, 2006 election, we reported on “Measure F,” which was approved by more than 60% of San Francisco, California residents. Measure F enacted a “Sick Leave Ordinance” (the Ordinance) that require... more
Presentation | Speech
John Ayanian
Presentation | Speech
Scott Karchmer, Heather Brookfield, Zaitun Poonja
Presentation | Speech
Edward Hansen
Presentation | Webcast
Sarah Bouchard, Karen Peteros, Michael Ossip
Presentation | Speech
Joan Haratani
Presentation | Speech
Joan Haratani
Presentation | Speech
Stephanie Blair
Presentation | Speech
Joan Haratani
Outside Publications | Article
Brian Johnsrud
Presentation | Speech
W. John McGuire
Outside Publications | Article
Jeffrey Raskin
On August 19, 2002, the California Supreme Court issued its ruling in Dart Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co., Case No. S086518 (August 19, 2002), a pro-policyholder decision on proving lost policies. The court held that proof of the "actual" policy language was not necessary. Instead, when an insurance policy is lost or was destroyed without fraudulent intent, the policyholder simply "has the burden of proving (1) the fact that he or she was insured under he lost policy during the period at issue, and (2) the substance of each policy provision essential to the claim for relief, i.e., essential to the particular coverage that the insured claims."
Presentation | Speech
Laura Remington
Presentation | Speech
Ben Indek
Presentation | Speech
Ron Dreben
Outside Publications | Article
Christopher Banks
Presentation | Speech
Jennifer A. Roney
Outside Publications | Article
Jeffrey Raskin
