<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blogs</title><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/rss/blogs</link><description>Blogs RSS Feed</description><count>25</count><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/09/federal-contractors-face-changing-employment-rules-and-persistent-fca-risk</link><title>Federal Contractors Face Changing Employment Rules and Persistent FCA Risk</title><description>Recent developments related to government contracting include significant changes to federal contractor affirmative action requirements and two developments involving False Claims Act (FCA) enforcement. The latest updates include US Department of Labor rules that formally rescind the regulations implementing Executive Order 11246 and modify Section 503 requirements, an Eleventh Circuit decision rejecting an Appointments Clause challenge to the FCA’s qui tam provisions, and a $2 million cybersecurity-related FCA settlement involving a defense contractor.</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>f7677c6f-40ec-4e85-86d3-c05195a9882e</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>Workplace Government Relations and Regulation</practice><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>Government Solutions</practice><practice>False Claims Act &amp; Qui Tam Litigation</practice><practice>Appellate</practice><practice>Cybersecurity, Incident Response &amp; Privacy</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Aerospace &amp; Defense</practice><practice>Defense Contractors Enforcement Matters</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>WSGR</PGcodes><PGcodes>WTR</PGcodes><PGcodes>FDA</PGcodes><PGcodes>ACCP</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Moshe Klein</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/09/cybersecurity-rules-gsa-fraud-referrals-and-the-armys-janus-program</link><title>Cybersecurity Rules, GSA Fraud Referrals, and the Army’s Janus Program</title><description>Recent government contracting developments include a potential milestone for governmentwide contractor cyber incident reporting requirements, the General Services Administration’s (GSA’s) identification of more than $13 billion in suspected procurement fraud, and the Army’s selection of contractors and installations for its Janus nuclear microreactor program.</description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>cff7f52f-c820-4373-a319-68f902d9cc74</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>Cybersecurity, Incident Response &amp; Privacy</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Defense &amp; Government Procurement</practice><practice>Nuclear Energy</practice><practice>Aerospace &amp; Defense</practice><practice>Energy</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>ACCP</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Scott Whitman</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/08/section-1260h-listings-affiliate-past-performance-and-best-value-awards</link><title>Section 1260H Listings, Affiliate Past Performance, and Best-Value Awards</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting include several significant court decisions affecting national security designations and bid protest practice. The latest updates include a US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decision requiring additional process before certain companies are designated as Chinese military companies, two US Court of Federal Claims decisions addressing when agencies may consider the experience and past performance of affiliated entities, and another Court of Federal Claims decision examining the level of analysis required to support a higher-priced best-value award.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>9867b7b5-7abb-4e92-8b03-6116541aa41b</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>Government Solutions</practice><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Defense Contractors Enforcement Matters</practice><practice>Defense &amp; Government Procurement</practice><practice>Aerospace &amp; Defense</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Clinton Small</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/08/sba-8a-changes-small-business-teaming-dow-accounting-reform-and-beneficial-ownership-reporting</link><title>SBA 8(a) Changes, Small Business Teaming, DoW Accounting Reform, and Beneficial Ownership Reporting</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting include the Small Business Administration’s new framework for establishing social disadvantage under the Section 8(a) Business Development Program, a Government Accountability Office decision requiring the US Army to permit small business teaming under its Marketplace for the Acquisition of Professional Services procurement, Department of War efforts to simplify contractor accounting requirements, and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network’s final rollback of Corporate Transparency Act reporting requirements.</description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>2a5faffc-0508-481e-9fca-6ddf5a113351</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>Workplace Government Relations and Regulation</practice><practice>Government Solutions</practice><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>Corporate Ethics &amp; Compliance</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Defense &amp; Government Procurement</practice><practice>Defense Contractors Enforcement Matters</practice><practice>Aerospace &amp; Defense</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>WSGR</PGcodes><PGcodes>WTR</PGcodes><PGcodes>ACCP</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Daniel Funaro</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/08/from-critical-materials-to-bid-protests-contractors-face-new-supply-chain-and-litigation-considerations</link><title>From Critical Materials to Bid Protests, Contractors Face New Supply Chain and Litigation Considerations</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting include a notable Government Accountability Office (GAO) decision involving proposal submission requirements, continued US Department of War (DoW) investment in critical defense supply chains, a US Department of Commerce action under the Defense Production Act involving critical materials, and two significant litigation developments involving the state secrets privilege and the Competition in Contracting Act’s (CICA’s) automatic stay provisions.</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>11c2715f-1bbb-45ff-8064-4c5bb9b566c2</guid><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>Government Solutions</practice><practice>Intellectual Property Litigation</practice><practice>Global Supply Chain Risk Management</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Intellectual Property</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Defense &amp; Government Procurement</practice><practice>Defense Contractors Enforcement Matters</practice><practice>Aerospace &amp; Defense</practice><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>IPLIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>SEC</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><PGcodes>IP</PGcodes><author>Scott Whitman</author><author>Christian Kozlowski</author><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/08/government-contractors-face-growing-scrutiny-across-compliance-grants-and-supply-chains</link><title>Government Contractors Face Growing Scrutiny Across Compliance, Grants, and Supply Chains</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting highlight continued expansion of False Claims Act (FCA) enforcement and growing federal attention to supply chain resilience. The latest updates include two Department of Justice (DOJ) FCA resolutions involving organizational conflicts of interest and grant administration, the department’s first healthcare declination under its revised corporate enforcement policy, and a new executive order directing sweeping changes to defense supply chain sourcing and oversight.</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>4b7fe07e-f2ca-4c71-8923-8b01a869f80e</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>False Claims Act &amp; Qui Tam Litigation</practice><practice>Global Supply Chain Risk Management</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Hospitals, Health Systems &amp; Academic Medical Centers</practice><practice>Healthcare</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>FDA</PGcodes><PGcodes>SEC</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Moshe Klein</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/07/govcon-update-grant-jurisdiction-epa-litigation-saudi-nuclear-agreement</link><title>Grant Jurisdiction, EPA Litigation, Saudi Nuclear Agreement</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting highlight questions surrounding federal court jurisdiction over grant-related disputes and a significant international agreement that could create future opportunities for the US nuclear industry. The latest updates include two court decisions addressing the line between Administrative Procedure Act (APA) challenges and Tucker Act contract claims, as well as a new civil nuclear cooperation agreement between the United States and Saudi Arabia.</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>002bb116-44f0-4ed3-8765-4e831287b897</guid><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>Environmental Counseling &amp;amp; Litigation</practice><practice>Climate</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Middle East</practice><practice>Saudi Arabia</practice><practice>Energy</practice><practice>Nuclear Energy</practice><practice>Healthcare</practice><practice>Hospitals, Health Systems &amp; Academic Medical Centers</practice><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Clinton Small</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/07/govcon-update-cmmc-delay-defense-m-and-a-asbca-decisions-dei-grants</link><title>CMMC Delay, Defense M&amp;A, ASBCA Decisions, DEI Grants</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting highlight significant changes affecting cybersecurity compliance, defense industry consolidation, contract disputes, and federal grant conditions. The latest updates include the Department of War’s decision to delay implementation of the next phase of the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification program, continued Department of Justice scrutiny of mergers in the defense industrial base, an Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals ruling on the public availability of Board decisions, and a federal court injunction blocking enforcement of certain DEI-related grant conditions.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>0d69fc63-d6ce-463a-a800-758c71a37533</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>Workplace Government Relations and Regulation</practice><practice>Government Solutions</practice><practice>Cybersecurity, Incident Response &amp; Privacy</practice><practice>Antitrust &amp;amp; Competition</practice><practice>Organizational Culture: Change &amp; Compliance</practice><practice>Global Employment &amp;amp; Immigration</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>WSGR</PGcodes><PGcodes>WTR</PGcodes><PGcodes>ACCP</PGcodes><PGcodes>ATR</PGcodes><PGcodes>IMM</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/07/govcon-update-cas-changes-ai-model-sharing-small-business-participation</link><title>CAS Changes, AI Model Sharing, Small Business Participation</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting highlight continued regulatory modernization, evolving artificial intelligence policy, and bid protest guidance on small business participation requirements. The latest updates include changes to the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), a new executive order directing agencies to design a voluntary framework for federal engagement with developers of covered frontier models, and a Government Accountability Office (GAO) decision addressing how agencies calculate small business participation under solicitation requirements.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>2687b9de-3719-4c01-a95b-3b9e1d0a1c4d</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Solutions</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Technology</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/07/govcon-update-gao-jurisdiction-doj-declination-cui-rule</link><title>GAO Jurisdiction, DOJ Declination, CUI Rule</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting highlight important updates in bid protest jurisdiction, national security enforcement, and cybersecurity compliance. This includes a Government Accountability Office decision clarifying the limits of its protest jurisdiction, the US Department of Justice’s first National Security Division declination under its revised corporate enforcement policy, and a proposed Federal Acquisition Regulation rule that would establish governmentwide requirements for safeguarding and reporting Controlled Unclassified Information.</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>7693efd1-7c7c-4fe8-b755-e43c29c70121</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Solutions</practice><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>International Trade &amp;amp; National Security</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Technology</practice><practice>Electronics &amp; Semiconductors</practice><practice>Telecoms &amp; Infrastructure</practice><practice>Software</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Scott Whitman</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/07/govcon-update-far-overhaul-ai-driven-fca-enforcement-bid-protests-and-trade-secrets</link><title>FAR Overhaul, AI-Driven FCA Enforcement, Bid Protests, and Trade Secrets</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting highlight continued procurement reform, evolving False Claims Act (FCA) enforcement, and significant litigation affecting bid protests, labor cost recovery, and protection of contractor intellectual property. The latest updates include the first proposed rules under the FAR Council’s Revolutionary FAR Overhaul, new US Department of Justice (DOJ) initiatives leveraging artificial intelligence in fraud enforcement, a Federal Circuit decision reinforcing bid protest timeliness requirements, and two contractor disputes involving labor costs and trade secrets.</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>d11c1eaf-5dd3-4284-ad2f-4eb399e0bf2e</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>Government Solutions</practice><practice>Workplace Government Relations and Regulation</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Defense &amp; Government Procurement</practice><practice>Aerospace &amp; Defense</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>WSGR</PGcodes><PGcodes>WTR</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Clinton Small</author><author>Scott Whitman</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/06/govcon-update-ai-and-ict-compliance-rare-earth-supply-chains-small-business-fraud-cyber-enforcement</link><title>AI and ICT Compliance, Rare Earth Supply Chains, Small Business Fraud, Cyber Enforcement</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting highlight growing federal attention to artificial intelligence (AI) governance, technology supply chain security, domestic industrial capacity, and contractor compliance obligations. The latest updates include new General Services Administration (GSA) rulemaking affecting information and communication technology (ICT) acquisitions, a significant Department of Defense (DoD) investment in domestic rare earth processing, and two Department of Justice (DOJ) settlements reinforcing continued enforcement priorities in the small business and cybersecurity arenas.</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>71c805a6-9224-4617-b253-0e51e772b9c0</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>Government Solutions</practice><practice>Global Supply Chain Risk Management</practice><practice>Cybersecurity, Incident Response &amp; Privacy</practice><practice>False Claims Act &amp; Qui Tam Litigation</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Technology</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><practice>Aerospace &amp; Defense</practice><practice>Defense &amp; Government Procurement</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>SEC</PGcodes><PGcodes>ACCP</PGcodes><PGcodes>FDA</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Scott Whitman</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/06/govcon-update-ai-policy-sba-8a-eligibility-nonprofit-funding-review-dei-litigation</link><title>AI Policy, SBA 8(a) Eligibility, Nonprofit Funding Review, DEI Litigation</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting highlight the administration’s evolving approach to artificial intelligence, continued scrutiny of DEI initiatives, and ongoing implementation of Executive Order 14398. The latest updates include a new national security policy memorandum on AI adoption, a proposed Small Business Administration rule affecting 8(a) eligibility, an Office of Management and Budget directive concerning federal funding of certain nonprofit organizations, and litigation challenging the administration’s DEI-related contractor requirements.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>96d86a64-fec7-405f-ac40-213bb6cda6d4</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>Organizational Culture: Change &amp; Compliance</practice><practice>Workplace Government Relations and Regulation</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>WTR</PGcodes><PGcodes>WSGR</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><author>Daniel Funaro</author><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/06/dojs-new-fca-fast-track-could-mean-earlier-whistleblower-litigation</link><title>DOJ’s New FCA Fast Track Could Mean Earlier Whistleblower Litigation</title><description>The US Department of Justice (DOJ) is changing how it reviews certain False Claims Act (FCA) whistleblower cases, and organizations participating in federally funded benefits programs should take notice.</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>a9f9a1fa-ef07-47d1-9918-da49297d4b21</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>False Claims Act &amp; Qui Tam Litigation</practice><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>FDA</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><author>Moshe Klein</author><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/06/supreme-court-edition-contractor-immunity-federal-removal-preemption</link><title>Supreme Court Edition – Contractor Immunity, Federal Removal, Preemption</title><description>With the US Supreme Court’s 2025–2026 term nearing its conclusion, several recent decisions have already emerged as important developments for government contractors. Although arising in different contexts, three rulings this term address the boundaries of contractor liability and the circumstances under which contractors may invoke federal protections when facing litigation. The decisions underscore a common theme: contractors are most likely to receive legal protection when they can demonstrate a clear connection between the challenged conduct and specific government direction or authorization.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>a000a0e9-13a5-4d0b-a13b-308dc978c99a</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>Appellate</practice><practice>Environmental Counseling &amp;amp; Litigation</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Aerospace &amp; Defense</practice><practice>Defense &amp; Government Procurement</practice><practice>Defense Contractors Enforcement Matters</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Moshe Klein</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/06/upcoming-govcon-webinar-for-tech-companies</link><title>Upcoming GovCon Webinar for Tech Companies</title><description>As the US government expands procurement of commercial products and services, technology companies, from startups to established firms, have growing opportunities to sell to and collaborate with federal agencies.</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>650f4442-2bac-45e0-913e-214b1130d075</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>False Claims Act &amp; Qui Tam Litigation</practice><practice>Cybersecurity, Incident Response &amp; Privacy</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Intellectual Property</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Aerospace &amp; Defense</practice><practice>Technology</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>FDA</PGcodes><PGcodes>ACCP</PGcodes><PGcodes>IP</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Amanda B. Robinson</author><author>Jaclyn Unis Whittaker</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/06/govcon-update-fy27-ndaa-fca-enforcement-transportation-funding</link><title>FY27 NDAA, FCA Enforcement, Transportation Funding</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting include the release of the House Armed Services Committee’s draft National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2027, a new Department of Justice (DOJ) initiative aimed at accelerating review of certain False Claims Act (FCA) whistleblower cases, and the advancement of a major surface transportation reauthorization bill in the House of Representatives, highlighting continued congressional and executive branch focus on defense modernization, fraud enforcement, and major infrastructure investment.</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>b00bc735-9055-41cb-9cd8-78c8fb603eea</guid><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Solutions</practice><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>International Trade &amp;amp; National Security</practice><practice>False Claims Act &amp; Qui Tam Litigation</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>FDA</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Moshe Klein</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/06/fixed-price-contracting-is-becoming-the-default-contractors-should-prepare-now</link><title>Fixed-Price Contracting Is Becoming the Default – Contractors Should Prepare Now</title><description>The White House’s recent executive order on federal contracting could significantly reshape how agencies structure procurements and allocate performance risk. Executive Order 14402, Promoting Efficiency, Accountability, and Performance in Federal Contracting , directs executive agencies to default to fixed-price contracts unless they can justify and obtain approval for another contract type.</description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>d7b88f71-f438-4dd6-ba6b-21239f277c5e</guid><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>Government Solutions</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Moshe Klein</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/05/govcon-update-quantum-funding-fixed-price-contracts-rule-of-two</link><title>Quantum Funding, Fixed-Price Contracts, Rule of Two</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting include a major Department of Commerce initiative to fund domestic quantum computing capabilities, continued implementation of the administration’s fixed-price contracting directive, and legislative efforts to codify the small business “Rule of Two” into statute. Together, these developments reflect continued emphasis on industrial policy, procurement reform, and preservation of longstanding small business contracting requirements.</description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>1e1ce095-5dd7-45da-b2ca-1becd23b7f4d</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>Government Solutions</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Technology</practice><practice>Electronics &amp; Semiconductors</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Christian Kozlowski</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/05/govcon-update-foci-rule-gao-oversight-fca-trade-enforcement</link><title>FOCI Rule, GAO Oversight, FCA Trade Enforcement</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting include a proposed US Department of Defense rule expanding foreign ownership, control, or influence (FOCI) requirements, a Government Accountability Office report focused on procurement reform and oversight, and a major False Claims Act settlement tied to customs duty evasion.</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>62b7c60b-135a-413a-ab52-5e9716dee25b</guid><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>False Claims Act &amp; Qui Tam Litigation</practice><practice>International Trade &amp;amp; National Security</practice><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>FDA</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Scott Whitman</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/05/govcon-update-buy-american-cybersecurity-enforcement-sba-certifications</link><title>Buy American, Cybersecurity Enforcement, SBA Certifications</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting highlight increased scrutiny of domestic sourcing and country-of-origin certifications, anticipated enforcement of cybersecurity requirements, and Small Business Administration activity focused on small business program compliance. These developments reflect continued alignment of procurement and enforcement priorities with supply chain security, data protection, and program integrity, directly impacting contractors across the federal marketplace.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>b7a8f4b2-dcd8-47e6-9fc0-947f6d870292</guid><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>Cybersecurity, Incident Response &amp; Privacy</practice><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Aerospace &amp; Defense</practice><practice>Defense &amp; Government Procurement</practice><practice>Defense Contractors Enforcement Matters</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>ACCP</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Daniel Funaro</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/05/govcon-update-procurement-eo-solicitation-cancellation-grant-conditions-far-overhaul</link><title>Procurement EO, Solicitation Cancellation, Grant Conditions, FAR Overhaul</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting include a new executive order focused on procurement discipline, two federal court decisions addressing agency discretion and grant conditions, and additional updates under the ongoing FAR Overhaul initiative. Together, these developments signal continued emphasis on cost control, performance accountability, and policy-driven procurement, with practical implications for contractors across the federal marketplace.</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>e588ab03-3f89-4146-80e9-1eddac79a194</guid><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>Organizational Culture: Change &amp; Compliance</practice><practice>Government Solutions</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><PGcodes>WTR</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Moshe Klein</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/04/gov-con-update-cofc-decision-far-deviation-dpa-actions-commercial-acquisitions</link><title>COFC Decision, FAR Deviation, DPA Actions, Commercial Acquisitions</title><description>Recent developments in government contracting include a notable US Court of Federal Claims decision involving US Agency for International Development (USAID) contract terminations, a significant Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) deviation implementing Executive Order 14398, new Defense Production Act (DPA) actions by the administration, and an Office of Management and Budget (OMB) memorandum aimed at increasing the use of commercial products and services in federal procurement.</description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>91cd6e0e-97bb-4221-8a59-d3594ef15c11</guid><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Solutions</practice><practice>Administrative Law &amp;amp; Federal Agencies</practice><practice>Global Supply Chain Risk Management</practice><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Aerospace &amp; Defense</practice><practice>Energy</practice><practice>Defense &amp; Government Procurement</practice><practice>Defense Contractors Enforcement Matters</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>SEC</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Moshe Klein</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/04/government-contractor-ma-the-diligence-issues-most-likely-to-affect-value</link><title>Government Contractor M&amp;A: The Diligence Issues Most Likely to Affect Value</title><description>While M&amp;A involving government contractors continues to attract strategic buyers and sponsors, with these deals comes a different level of diligence than a typical commercial transaction. The reason is straightforward: when a company does business with the government, contract performance, compliance, and enforcement risk are often closely linked. In addition to creating operational friction, a diligence issue may affect valuation or future eligibility for work or expose the buyer to inherited liability.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>1ef2ad6d-d5b7-4eb7-9cab-4d6638835037</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>False Claims Act &amp; Qui Tam Litigation</practice><practice>Mergers &amp;amp; Acquisitions</practice><practice>Cybersecurity, Incident Response &amp; Privacy</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>FDA</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><PGcodes>MA</PGcodes><PGcodes>ACCP</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Justin D. Weitz</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/governmentcontractorguidebook/2026/04/govcon-update-ai-clause-fy-2027-budget-signals-and-cas-threshold-reforms</link><title>AI Clause, FY 2027 Budget Signals, and CAS Threshold Reforms</title><description>Recent developments across procurement policy, federal budgeting, and cost accounting standards signal meaningful shifts for government contractors. A newly proposed acquisition clause from the General Services Administration (GSA) would introduce government-unique requirements for artificial intelligence (AI). The White House’s FY 2027 budget request underscores a continued prioritization of defense spending. And the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) Board has proposed long-anticipated reforms that could narrow CAS applicability.</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>312b260b-469e-4bd4-b046-487ccbb7334c</guid><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><practice>Technology</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>Clinton Small</author></item></channel></rss>