<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Blogs</title><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/rss/blogs</link><description>Blogs RSS Feed</description><count>25</count><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/11/exclusivity-in-technology-licensing-and-development-agreements</link><title>Exclusivity in Technology Licensing and Development Agreements: What Does It Cover?</title><description>Exclusivity is a familiar concept in technology licensing and development agreements, but its meaning is not always straightforward. An exclusive patent license, for example, is different from an exclusive development arrangement, and neither necessarily gives a party exclusive rights to manufacture or sell the resulting products. Understanding what exclusivity means in a particular agreement requires examining who is restricted, what rights are covered, and which activities fall within the scope.</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 00:00:00 -0600</pubDate><body></body><guid>7411e9c7-b928-4d1e-ba9e-6a79ca6068c9</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Rahul Kapoor</author><author>Katrina Slack </author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/10/governing-ai-supplier-management-across-the-modern-delivery-ecosystem</link><title>Governing AI &amp; Supplier Management Across the Modern Delivery Ecosystem</title><description>Organizations are increasingly leveraging a range of delivery models to provide business services, including internal teams, Global Business Services (GBS), Global Capability Centers (GCCs), outsourcing providers, and managed services. As organizations combine these approaches with AI-enabled delivery, important governance considerations include accountability, decision making, performance, and contractual obligations across an interconnected ecosystem of suppliers, internal teams, and AI systems.</description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>00cc98e7-b431-4607-8800-cec6dd5514d6</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>Asia</practice><practice>Europe</practice><practice>Latin America</practice><practice>Middle East</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Technology</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Barbara Murphy Melby</author><author>Christopher C. Archer</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/10/gpu-as-a-service-and-colocation-different-approaches-to-ai-computing-infrastructure</link><title>GPU as a Service and Colocation: Different Approaches to AI Computing Infrastructure</title><description>As AI drives demand for greater computing power, businesses have more options for accessing the technology needed to support AI workloads. One option is GPU as a service (GPUaaS), which allows customers to access specialized computing resources without purchasing the underlying hardware. While GPUaaS shares similarities with traditional cloud services, it also invites comparison with data center colocation arrangements.</description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>5e3444f0-0156-4e25-b5ac-3a1bf89e9301</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><practice>Data Centers</practice><practice>Technology</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Katherine B. O'Keefe</author><author>Erik Karpinski</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/10/traditional-vs-ai-computing-infrastructure-implications-for-data-center-operations-and-colocation-agreements</link><title>Traditional vs. AI Computing Infrastructure: Implications for Data Center Operations and Colocation Agreements</title><description>As AI continues to shape the technology industry, computing equipment housed in data centers is evolving to support a broad range of workloads. While traditional general-purpose servers remain essential for everyday business operations, AI workloads may run on conventional servers, accelerator-equipped servers, or more integrated computing systems. The resulting differences in equipment architecture and deployment can provide useful context for understanding data center operation and colocation arrangements.</description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>52ca8de5-025a-4000-af20-76640fbd4968</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Data Centers</practice><practice>Technology</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Katherine B. O'Keefe</author><author>Erik Karpinski</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/10/same-service-different-model-managing-ai-model-changes-in-technology-agreements</link><title>Same Service, Different Model: Managing AI Model Changes in Technology Agreements</title><description>A company licenses an artificial intelligence–enabled service after evaluating its functionality, security, performance, and compliance characteristics. Six months later, the provider upgrades the underlying model or replaces it altogether. The product may look the same, but the technology beneath it may have changed in ways that affect performance, data processing, regulatory compliance, or the customer’s downstream obligations.</description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>4d9b4e99-d9d5-4695-b435-970a5b8f4290</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><practice>Technology</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Emily R. Lowe</author><author>Fredrick T. Philantrope</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/10/contract-corner-tsas-mastering-it-transition-services</link><title>Contract Corner: TSAs: Mastering IT Transition Services</title><description>When an M&amp;A transaction closes, the buyer will typically be unable to stand up its own IT environment on day one. In this scenario, the seller often continues operating existing IT systems, provides access to employees who understand them, and delivers data needed for the transition for a period after closing to assist the buyer in eventually operating a standalone IT environment of its own.</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>88fbcd6a-556e-4fbc-98b6-8a022c4adc17</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Emily R. Lowe</author><author>Fredrick T. Philantrope</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/09/californias-new-child-online-safety-laws-reach-the-product-stack</link><title>California’s New Child Online Safety Laws Reach the Product Stack</title><description>A teenager opens an app. The feed is personalized based on earlier activity. The next video starts automatically. A companion chatbot remembers yesterday’s conversation. To the user, these may appear to be features of one service. Under a new package of California laws, they are separate design choices that can carry different compliance obligations.</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>7cd2eb65-fe32-4bf3-b7b9-1047c60ded99</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><practice>Technology</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Emily R. Lowe</author><author>Fredrick T. Philantrope</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/09/ai-deliverables-and-liability-considerations-for-risk-allocation</link><title>AI Deliverables and Liability: Considerations for Risk Allocation</title><description>As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in development services, outsourcing arrangements, and other commercial and technology transactions, customers and vendors are confronting a deceptively simple question: How should risk be allocated when a deliverable is created using AI?</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>e08436ab-4eab-409c-80e7-5ff8bf866eab</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><practice>Technology</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Emily R. Lowe</author><author>Fredrick T. Philantrope</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/09/join-us-for-a-panel-discussion-on-law-and-the-fashion-industry</link><title>Join Us for a Panel Discussion on Law and the Fashion Industry</title><description>Join intellectual property (IP) partner Colleen Ganin for Fashioning the Law: A Panel Discussion and Q&amp;A, presented by Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts and Morgan Lewis. Colleen will be joined by Ayisha Morgan, General Counsel of Elite World Group, and David Eshmoili, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of David Yurman, for a discussion of the legal and business issues shaping the fashion industry, from brand protection and intellectual property to the growing impact of AI on fashion and creative businesses.</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>e4018157-ff9d-41d0-a236-830b0f7d8ec0</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Intellectual Property Litigation</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>Intellectual Property</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Luxury &amp; Fashion Brands</practice><practice>Retail &amp; Ecommerce</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>IPLIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><PGcodes>IP</PGcodes><author>Emily R. Lowe</author><author>Fredrick T. Philantrope</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/09/beyond-the-logo-contracting-for-the-new-era-of-brand-partnerships-part-2</link><title>Beyond the Logo: Contracting for the New Era of Brand Partnerships (Part 2)</title><description>Modern brand partnerships raise contract questions around exclusivity, reputational risk, how influencer and celebrity content can be used after it is posted, and how the parties will measure performance. Part 2 of this Contract Corner series examines how parties can address those issues in their agreements.</description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>c0bad9ce-7271-46f8-9a5c-79ba46e6dc98</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Intellectual Property Litigation</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>Intellectual Property</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>IPLIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><PGcodes>IP</PGcodes><author>Emily R. Lowe</author><author>Fredrick T. Philantrope</author><author>Dana S. Gross</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/09/join-us-for-a-webinar-on-ai-contracting-in-an-era-of-digital-dependency</link><title>Join Us for a Webinar on AI Contracting in an Era of Digital Dependency</title><description>As AI continues to be incorporated into service offerings, outsourcing arrangements, and other commercial transactions, companies may find they are contracting for more than a discrete technology tool. They may also be creating an operational dependency on a provider’s AI models, data practices, supporting technology, and continued performance.</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>7cbee420-e560-4fd2-bd89-a8c2542f35d8</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Investment Management</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><practice>Technology</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>IMPG</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Emily R. Lowe</author><author>Fredrick T. Philantrope</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/09/beyond-the-logo-contracting-for-the-new-era-of-brand-partnerships-part-1</link><title>Beyond the Logo: Contracting for the New Era of Brand Partnerships (Part 1)</title><description>Brand partnerships are expanding beyond traditional sponsorships and celebrity endorsements into arrangements that can combine licensing, content creation, product development, distribution, and data sharing. As those relationships become more complex, contracts need to clearly define the partnership, control of brand assets, and what happens to jointly created materials when the relationship ends.</description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>4ebee7a3-4e58-48ae-abef-5d52d8cd4c7e</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Emily R. Lowe</author><author>Fredrick T. Philantrope</author><author>Dana S. Gross</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/08/when-a-cyber-loss-has-no-conventional-hacker</link><title>When a Cyber Loss Has No Conventional Hacker</title><description>Cyber insurance traditionally assumes a familiar sequence: an attacker gains access to a system, data is stolen or operations are disrupted, and a claim follows. Autonomous systems may complicate every step, including whether the event qualifies as a cyber incident at all.</description><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>8e4ce306-a981-4dd9-b0ee-5ed1ec7a2a9c</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><practice>Technology</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Anastasia Dergacheva</author><author>Michael R. Pfeuffer</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/08/buying-a-summer-streaming-subscription-read-the-fine-print</link><title>Buying a Summer Streaming Subscription? Read the Fine Print</title><description>Signing up for a streaming service might be faster than choosing what to watch, with only a few taps unlocking a month of movies, a season of sports, or enough airline Wi-Fi to make a long flight feel shorter. That convenience, however, rests on a recurring contract that may continue after the vacation ends, change price while it remains in effect, and provide less control over content than the word “subscription” suggests.</description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>b05d90ab-74d6-45e0-b7c5-d0ca62c15961</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Anastasia Dergacheva</author><author>Michael R. Pfeuffer</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/08/contract-corner-the-contracts-behind-cruise-ship-technology</link><title>Contract Corner: The Contracts Behind Cruise Ship Technology</title><description>A February 2026 IT disruption illustrates how technology dependencies can affect cruise operations. Carnival Cruise Line said the issue arose during planned maintenance and affected embarkation, disembarkation, and other technology tools. Reports of the disruption also identified impacts to Wi-Fi and the Carnival HUB app, while navigation and safety systems remained operational.</description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>f6efd0bb-e4fb-4e9d-9f0b-0936bf1a49b6</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Anastasia Dergacheva</author><author>Michael R. Pfeuffer</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/08/ai-concierge-services-who-is-liable-when-a-bot-books-the-wrong-vacation</link><title>AI Concierge Services – Who Is Liable When a Bot Books the Wrong Vacation?</title><description>A traveler asks an AI concierge to book a quiet oceanfront hotel in Naples for the weekend. Only after the confirmations arrive does the traveler discover that the bot selected Naples, Florida, while the flight is headed to Rome. The hotel is nonrefundable. As AI concierge services move beyond suggesting restaurants and into booking flights, hotels, rental cars, and activities, errors can quickly result in actual charges and disputes over responsibility. When a bot selects the wrong dates, overlooks a cancellation restriction, or books a hotel it was intended merely to recommend, the question becomes who is responsible for the error and the resulting costs.</description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>35b61140-2ec6-4f5d-81ab-5520669a44ff</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Technology</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Anastasia Dergacheva</author><author>Michael R. Pfeuffer</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/08/eu-ai-acts-transparency-rules-what-went-into-effect-on-2-august</link><title>EU AI Act’s Transparency Rules: What Went Into Effect on 2 August?</title><description>On 2 August 2026, the transparency obligations in Article 50 of the EU AI Act began to apply. Relative to Article 50, the EU Digital Omnibus (which amended the EU AI Act) only deferred certain specific obligations. As such, the bulk of the Article 50 obligations are already applicable to organizations subject to the EU AI Act. Below is a high-level overview. An upcoming accompanying LawFlash will examine the obligations and exceptions contained in Article 50, the Commission’s Guidelines, and the Code of Practice referenced below in more detail.</description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>dfa0b420-6e1c-4869-b480-21f211246063</guid><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>US Labor/&amp;#8203;Management Relations</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Cybersecurity, Incident Response &amp; Privacy</practice><practice>Europe</practice><practice>Technology</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><PGcodes>LMR</PGcodes><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>ACCP</PGcodes><author>Katherine (Kat) Gibson</author><author>Vishnu Shankar</author><author>Anastasia Dergacheva</author><author>Michael R. Pfeuffer</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/08/hotel-wi-fi-terms-conditions-the-contract-you-accept-without-reading</link><title>Hotel Wi-Fi Terms &amp; Conditions – The Contract You Accept Without Reading</title><description>After a day of flight delays, crowded airports, and rental-car lines, the corporate traveler finally reaches the hotel, drops a bag in the room, and opens a laptop. The hotel Wi-Fi portal requests a room number, last name, and perhaps an email address. At the bottom sits a familiar checkbox: “I Agree.” Click. Congratulations, you may have just entered into the least-negotiated contract of your trip. Hotel Wi-Fi terms vary, and their enforceability may depend on applicable law and how the terms are presented. But publicly available terms reveal that the complimentary connection can come with a substantial set of conditions covering liability, data collection, dispute resolution, and acceptable use. Although most travelers will never have a dispute over hotel Wi-Fi, corporate travelers should understand what may be included before using the connection to access sensitive business information.</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>3f08e5b8-3f5b-4d77-b40a-bd89fb2be302</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Anastasia Dergacheva</author><author>Michael R. Pfeuffer</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/07/a-pro-curated-list-of-contractual-provisions-sourcing-teams-should-not-ignore---part-2</link><title>A (Pro)Curated List of Contractual Provisions Sourcing Teams Should Not Ignore (Part 2)</title><description>As a follow-up to Part 1, in which we discussed increased reliability on sourcing teams’ input for commercial negotiations, this Part 2 discusses additional common provisions sourcing teams should consider in their oversight and management of the contracting process.</description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>c7b55723-049f-47ac-ab80-f769583991a2</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Aaron J. Rogers</author><author>A. Benjamin Klaber</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/07/a-pro-curated-list-of-contractual-provisions-sourcing-teams-should-not-ignore-part-1</link><title>A (Pro)Curated List of Contractual Provisions Sourcing Teams Should Not Ignore (Part 1)</title><description>Sourcing teams are assuming increasing responsibilities in the contracting process, playing a central role in managing an array of issues, including legal, operational, financial, and information security risks. In an effort to streamline contracting lifecycles and reduce legal costs, companies often prefer legal counsel to focus on complex issues around intellectual property rights, indemnification, or regulatory compliance. This often leaves important unresolved issues to be negotiated by the sourcing team.  Fortunately, by focusing on certain terms of outsized impact that arise across deals, sourcing departments can contribute significantly to managing their companies’ risk profiles.</description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>c175167d-c488-4776-ad87-d752f430a614</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>A. Benjamin Klaber</author><author>Aaron J. Rogers</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/07/contractual-freedom-to-operate-a-surgical-approach</link><title>Contractual Freedom to Operate: A Surgical Approach</title><description>While a freedom-to-operate (FTO) analysis often centers on patent or trademark searches, contractual commitments can establish the practical boundaries—or maze—of a company’s degrees of freedom. Organizations with a checklist of high-level issues to be addressed during contract discussion and negotiation (such as liability, compliance, and data protection) should consider adding FTO to that list. With a more holistic perspective of the FTO landscape and with business and technical teams’ input, commercial counsel can find creative ways to complete the puzzle.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>55593f66-bafd-4439-9a85-711f4ebc7c0d</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Telecommunications, Media &amp;amp; Technology</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>TMT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>A. Benjamin Klaber</author><author>Aaron J. Rogers</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/07/spotlight-on-kat-gibson-navigating-labor-and-employment-issues-in-global-outsourcing</link><title>Spotlight on Kat Gibson: Navigating Labor and Employment Issues in Global Outsourcing</title><description>Global outsourcing transactions often require companies to navigate not only complex commercial issues, but also employment-related regulations and local practices that can vary significantly across jurisdictions. As organizations continue to transform their operations through outsourcing, managed services, and digital and AI transformation initiatives, labor and employment considerations have become an increasingly important part of transaction planning. Partner Kat Gibson advises multinational companies on the employment issues that arise in outsourcing transactions, including employee transfers, workforce restructurings, reductions in force, consultation obligations, and cross-border employment compliance. We recently sat down with Kat to discuss some key labor issues companies should be thinking about when planning global outsourcing transactions.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>7b3a5551-1353-4ca9-888b-b7147c2a6e8a</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Global Outsourcing</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Doneld G. Shelkey</author><author>Barbara Murphy Melby</author><author>Katherine (Kat) Gibson</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/07/termination-for-convenience-the-battle-over-free-will</link><title>Termination for Convenience: The Battle over Free Will</title><description>Flexibility versus certainty is an important and often challenging tradeoff throughout commercial contract negotiations, particularly regarding termination for convenience. Customers, mindful of shifting budgets, technological changes, and evolving business needs, want the freedom to walk away at their discretion. Vendors, mindful of upfront infrastructure investments, staffing needs, and revenue volatility, want a committed income stream. Reconciling these competing needs can become a significant sticking point, often arising later in the negotiation cycle after other issues have been settled.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>3bb5ed18-5e53-4a2f-a5d6-49b0a116ca88</guid><practice>Telecommunications, Media &amp;amp; Technology</practice><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>Technology</practice><PGcodes>TMT</PGcodes><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Aaron J. Rogers</author><author>A. Benjamin Klaber</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/07/key-considerations-for-service-providers-when-allowing-service-provider-personnel-to-work-remotely</link><title>Key Considerations for Service Providers When Allowing Service Provider Personnel to Work Remotely</title><description>Remote and hybrid work arrangements are becoming increasingly common across industries, and service providers are more frequently allowing personnel to perform services from remote locations. While these arrangements can, in certain cases, offer operational benefits, they also introduce security, compliance, and oversight risks that must be accounted for. Accordingly, organizations engaging service providers with remote workforces should consider contractual requirements to address these concerns. When drafting and implementing these requirements, customers should consider the following issues.</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>f447a62f-3012-4ec3-9c7c-a39c86391ab7</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><author>Katrina Slack </author><author>Vito Petretti</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/07/ai-outsourcing-series-rethinking-outsourcing-governance-compliance-and-control-in-the-ai-era</link><title>AI &amp; Outsourcing Series: Rethinking Outsourcing Governance – Compliance and Control in the AI Era</title><description>Throughout this AI &amp; Outsourcing Services series, we have explored how artificial intelligence is transforming the outsourcing industry, reshaping contract terms, creating new forms of vendor dependency, and redefining how value is measured and priced. As organizations increasingly deploy AI-enabled technologies within outsourced environments, another critical issue is emerging: governance.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>5c7440cd-5e44-48e6-a6e7-bfc59d5a188b</guid><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Intellectual Property</practice><practice>Technology Transactions</practice><practice>Global Outsourcing</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Technology</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>IP</PGcodes><author>Marina G. Aronchik</author><author>C. ("Kari") Krusmark</author><author>Barbara Murphy Melby</author></item></channel></rss>