<rss xmlns:a10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Publication</title><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/rss/publication</link><description>Publications RSS Feed</description><count>25</count><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/04/ai-enforcement-accelerates-as-federal-policy-stalls-and-states-step-in</link><title>AI Enforcement Accelerates as Federal Policy Stalls and States Step In</title><description>Artificial intelligence is evolving faster than the legal frameworks that govern it. In the United States, comprehensive federal AI legislation remains elusive, yet regulatory and litigation activity is intensifying across multiple fronts. Federal agencies are relying on existing statutes to police AI-related conduct, whereas states are moving aggressively to enact AI laws and expand enforcement under antitrust, consumer protection, and false claims statutes and private plaintiffs are testing new liability theories across industries.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>c69c1357-cd6d-4cfc-a0a4-e3c83ee48034</guid><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>State Attorneys General</practice><practice>Antitrust &amp;amp; Competition</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><practice>Technology</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>ATR</PGcodes><author>Elizabeth B. Herrington</author><author>Heather Egan</author><author>Rishi P. Satia</author><author>Ezra D. Church</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/04/from-assistant-to-actor-what-the-rise-of-agentic-ai-means-for-your-business</link><title>From Assistant to Actor: What the Rise of Agentic AI Means for Your Business</title><description>We are currently witnessing a fundamental shift in the role that AI plays in enterprise operations, transitioning from a system that responds when prompted to one that plans, decides, and acts on its own. This shift has a name: agentic AI. And for business leaders and counsel advising on technology strategy, it deserves serious attention right now.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>f79c007d-0416-4c5b-bb7a-087f814092bd</guid><practice>Telecommunications, Media &amp;amp; Technology</practice><practice>Cybersecurity, Incident Response &amp; Privacy</practice><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><practice>Technology</practice><PGcodes>TMT</PGcodes><PGcodes>ACCP</PGcodes><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Doneld G. Shelkey</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/healthlawscan/2026/04/major-government-updates-from-ahla-medicare-and-medicaid-conference</link><title>Major Government Updates from AHLA Medicare and Medicaid Conference</title><description>From March 18–20, 2026, the American Health Law Association (AHLA) hosted its annual Institute on Medicare and Medicaid Payment Issues conference in Baltimore, Maryland, focused on the full range of risks and opportunities relating to participation in federal health care payment programs. The schedule provided a formal blueprint for addressing updates in Medicare Parts A &amp; B, Medicaid program changes, supplemental payments, cost reporting, appeals, fraud and abuse, compliance obligations, and health equity requirements. Partners Scott McBride and Greg Etzel made presentations on the underpinnings of overpayments and on Medicare cost reporting and appeals, respectively.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>a6cf5039-4efc-45ba-8603-ba81eb3f0168</guid><practice>United States</practice><practice>Healthcare</practice><author>Tesch Leigh West</author><author>Gregory N. Etzel</author><author>B. Scott McBride</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/04/negotiating-ai-provisions-in-commercial-and-technology-contracts-where-the-market-is-heading</link><title>Negotiating AI Provisions in Commercial and Technology Contracts: Where the Market Is Heading</title><description>Two years ago, many technology agreements addressed artificial intelligence (AI), if at all, through a generic disclaimer or a brief acknowledgment that AI features might be included in the offering. Today, that approach is inadequate. The integration of AI into commercial products, outsourcing arrangements, and enterprise software agreements has forced a rethinking of longstanding contract frameworks.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>71231356-69b1-41d8-8efc-0909b17a5ecc</guid><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>eData</practice><practice>Intellectual Property</practice><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Technology</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>EDATA</PGcodes><PGcodes>IP</PGcodes><author>Doneld G. Shelkey</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/04/unified-enforcement-meets-national-security-doj-signals-a-more-active-nsd</link><title>Unified Enforcement Meets National Security: DOJ Signals a More Active NSD</title><description>On March 30, 2026, the US Department of Justice’s National Security Division (NSD) provided additional details on reporting potential violations of national security laws, including those pertaining to arms control, dual-use export controls, economic sanctions, or otherwise based on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>90cf90c7-8876-4e4d-8625-7fcf050aa157</guid><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>International Trade &amp;amp; National Security</practice><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>Foreign Corrupt Practices Act &amp;amp; Global Anti-Corruption</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><author>Justin D. Weitz</author><author>Michael H. Huneke</author><author>Moshe Klein</author><author>Amanda B. Robinson</author><author>Sandra Moser</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/04/moving-the-goalposts-key-employment-law-updates-for-football-clubs</link><title>Moving the Goalposts: Key Employment Law Updates for Football Clubs</title><description>Having received Royal Assent at the end of last year, reforms introduced by the Employment Rights Act 2025 are due to enter into force over the next few months. The reforms will have a significant impact on the rights of employees and the approach of employers, and football clubs should consider what they can do now to prepare.</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>3ecf1e75-2449-4bf4-9b06-19cc5d63a762</guid><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>Employment Counseling</practice><practice>Workforce Change</practice><practice>Europe</practice><practice>United Kingdom</practice><practice>Sports</practice><practice>Professional Sports Leagues, Teams &amp; Players</practice><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><author>Louise Skinner</author><author>Katherine (Kat) Gibson</author><author>Phoebe Fardell</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/04/the-effects-of-aifmd-2-on-private-credit</link><title>The Effects of AIFMD 2 on Private Credit, Finascope</title><description>Partner Clément Vandevooghel and associate Agathe Llorens co-authored an article for Finascope examining the impact of AIFMD 2 on the private credit market and the evolving regulatory framework for alternative investment fund managers</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>009cc904-b30f-4d81-ab10-c60378eb9a64</guid><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>Investment Management</practice><practice>Structured Transactions</practice><practice>Private Credit</practice><practice>Europe</practice><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><PGcodes>IMPG</PGcodes><PGcodes>ST</PGcodes><PGcodes>PL</PGcodes><author>Clément Vandevooghel</author><author>Agathe Llorens</author><office>Paris</office></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/04/website-tracking-data-breaches-and-ai-class-actions-managing-escalating-technology-litigation-risk</link><title>Website Tracking, Data Breaches, and AI Class Actions: Managing Escalating Technology Litigation Risk</title><description>Routine digital practices such as cookies, tracking pixels, session replay tools, cybersecurity controls, AI-driven marketing, and pricing algorithms are all now being scrutinized through the lens of class litigation. This Insight summarizes our recent Morgan Lewis Class Action Academy webinar, examining the major litigation trends and practical considerations for risk mitigation.</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>52f2c2b3-bc98-4408-a2f5-beccc40ec82c</guid><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Cybersecurity, Incident Response &amp; Privacy</practice><practice>Global Class &amp; Group Actions</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Technology</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>ACCP</PGcodes><author>Megan A. Suehiro</author><author>Heather Egan</author><author>Catherine North Hounfodji</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/03/ai-in-m-and-a-the-shift-from-competitive-advantage-to-governance-imperative</link><title>AI in M&amp;A: The Shift from Competitive Advantage to Governance Imperative</title><description>Artificial intelligence is no longer a fringe capability or experimental tool. It is rapidly becoming a core pillar of corporate strategy, with its influence now extending across the entire deal lifecycle, from sourcing opportunities and shaping valuations to conducting diligence and driving post-transaction integration. Against this backdrop, AI readiness is emerging as a decisive factor in both competitive positioning and transaction value.</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>0f4df477-0429-4775-ac2d-434b4620a96d</guid><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Intellectual Property</practice><practice>Technology Transactions</practice><practice>Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Global Outsourcing</practice><practice>Technology</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>IP</PGcodes><author>Doneld G. Shelkey</author><author>A. Benjamin Klaber</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/03/doj-continues-scrutiny-of-health-system-contracting-in-second-2026-antitrust-case</link><title>DOJ Continues Scrutiny of Health System Contracting in Second 2026 Antitrust Case</title><description>The US Department of Justice Antitrust Division (DOJ) in March 2026 brought an antitrust action against NewYork-Presbyterian (NYP), alleging that the health system’s contracts with commercial payors restrict “budget-conscious plans” and are anticompetitive under the federal antitrust laws. The suit follows a similar recent action against OhioHealth and demonstrates DOJ’s commitment to challenging certain payor-provider contract restrictions that it believes limits the availability of more cost-effective healthcare plans for employers and patients.</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>c59453de-dcbb-41a8-8a8d-0b0794d4892b</guid><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Antitrust &amp;amp; Competition</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Healthcare</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>ATR</PGcodes><author>Zachary M. Johns</author><author>Ryan Kantor</author><author>B. Scott McBride</author><author>Vincent C. Papa</author><author>Nicholas Pfeiffer </author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/03/dont-let-the-data-walk-out-the-door-reuters</link><title>Don’t Let the Data Walk Out the Door: Aligning Legal, HR, and IT at Employee Exit, Reuters</title><description>Partner Tara Lawler, of counsel Matthew Hamilton, and associate Lindsey Bonafede co-authored an article for Reuters examining how organizations can mitigate data preservation risks during employee departures through coordinated legal, HR, and IT processes.</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>6ef99c5b-338f-42f2-b403-32fd17301b27</guid><practice>eData</practice><practice>eDiscovery</practice><practice>Information Governance</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>Employment Counseling</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>EDATA</PGcodes><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><author>Tara S. Lawler</author><author>Matthew J. Hamilton</author><author>Lindsey L. Bonafede</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/03/football-governance-act-ifr-information-gathering-and-enforcement</link><title>Football Governance Act: IFR Information Gathering and Enforcement</title><description>The Football Governance Act 2025 (the Act) places statutory obligations on football clubs, their owners, officers, and senior managers, as well as organisers of specified competitions. These obligations are enforced by the Independent Football Regulator (IFR). The Act significantly expands the IFR’s powers to gather information from clubs, owners, and other persons and to investigate suspected instances of noncompliance with information requirements. This Insight outlines the IFR’s powers to gather such information, how suspected breaches will be investigated, and how sanctions will be decided.</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>6bccd6c3-70e0-49de-9173-460b08ba0433</guid><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>Europe</practice><practice>United Kingdom</practice><practice>Sports</practice><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Abbey Brimson</author><author>Mark Geday</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/03/key-takeaways-for-dealmakers-navigating-cfius-and-international-trade-issues</link><title>Key Takeaways for Dealmakers Navigating CFIUS and International Trade Issues</title><description>In many transactions, national security and international trade issues surface early in due diligence, shape negotiation of deal documents, and can determine whether a signing-to-closing timeline is at all realistic. In the United States, this often means assessing the potential for a review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), the interagency body that evaluates certain foreign investments for national security risks.</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>038af7f9-8490-42ff-b40c-ab6b8e4ad95e</guid><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>CFIUS</practice><practice>International Trade &amp;amp; National Security</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>Mergers &amp;amp; Acquisitions</practice><practice>Capital Markets &amp;amp; Public Companies</practice><practice>Emerging Companies &amp; Venture Capital</practice><practice>Private Equity</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><PGcodes>MA</PGcodes><PGcodes>SEC</PGcodes><PGcodes>EBT</PGcodes><PGcodes>PE</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><author>David Plotinsky</author><author>Christian Kozlowski</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/upandatom/2026/03/nrc-continues-environmental-review-reform-with-expanded-use-of-categorical-exclusions</link><title>NRC Continues Environmental Review Reform with Expanded Use of Categorical Exclusions</title><description>The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) recently issued a final rule, effective April 29, 2026, amending its regulations governing categorical exclusions for certain actions. As defined by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), a categorical exclusion is a category of actions that a federal agency has determined normally does not significantly affect the quality of the human environment. The NRC’s categorical exclusions are implemented as part of its NEPA regulations (see 10 CFR §§ 51.14; 51.22).</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>201c3759-99f3-4e07-86e2-d65336362e58</guid><practice>Energy &amp; Infrastructure</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Energy</practice><PGcodes>ENE</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Brooke Poole Clark</author><author>Timothy P. Matthews</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/03/powering-data-centers-energy-strategy-and-structuring-for-a-constrained-grid</link><title>Powering Data Centers: Energy Strategy and Structuring for a Constrained Grid</title><description>Rapid growth in data center development is reshaping US energy markets and regulatory priorities. Data centers currently account for approximately 4.5% of US electricity consumption, with projections indicating that demand could rise to between 9% and 17% of total electricity generation by 2030. This expansion is driving new approaches to energy procurement, increasing pressure on infrastructure, and prompting policymakers to reassess how costs and risks are allocated. Nuclear power is emerging as a potential solution to meet this demand due to its ability to provide reliable, continuous baseload electricity at scale. For developers, operators, and investors, securing reliable and scalable power has become a central commercial and legal challenge.</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>b3ff93fd-8d72-4ee8-9661-48cb0e6bd200</guid><practice>Energy &amp; Infrastructure</practice><practice>Tax</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Data Centers</practice><practice>Energy</practice><practice>Nuclear Energy</practice><practice>Technology</practice><PGcodes>ENE</PGcodes><PGcodes>TAX</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Jane Accomando</author><author>Arjun P. Ramadevanahalli</author><author>Paul A. Gordon</author><author>M. Jared Sanders</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/03/washington-adopts-9-9-tax-on-residents-earning-over-1-million</link><title>Washington Adopts 9.9% Tax on Residents Earning Over $1 Million</title><description>Washington, long one of the few states without a personal income tax, has enacted a 9.9% tax on income above $1 million. The law is set to take effect in 2028 and is expected to face prompt constitutional challenges.</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>e1155156-a2f4-403e-932d-4b2cc172f2e0</guid><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>Tax</practice><practice>State and Local Tax</practice><practice>Family Offices</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><PGcodes>TAX</PGcodes><author>Cosimo A. Zavaglia</author><author>William H. Gorrod</author><author>Anthony D. Cipriano</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/03/crypto-clarity-cftc-faqs-clarify-use-of-crypto-assets-by-registrants-and-registered-entities-part-2</link><title>Crypto Clarity: CFTC FAQs Clarify Use of Crypto Assets by Registrants and Registered Entities – Part 2</title><description>The CFTC’s Market Participants Division (MPD) and Division of Clearing and Risk (DCR) jointly issued on March 20, 2026 responses to 11 frequently asked questions addressing how futures commission merchants, derivatives clearing organizations, and swap dealers may use crypto assets and blockchain technologies under existing CFTC regulations and recent staff guidance.</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>824812ca-b8a2-45a3-b694-3c930732666c</guid><practice>Investment Management</practice><practice>Securities Enforcement</practice><practice>Derivatives &amp; Futures</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Banking</practice><practice>Fintech &amp; Digital Assets</practice><practice>Investment Funds</practice><PGcodes>IMPG</PGcodes><PGcodes>SEC</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><author>Stacie Hartman</author><author>Robert A. Schwartz</author><author>Joseph Stuart Healy</author><author>Nikita Cotton</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/03/new-executive-order-targets-federal-contractor-dei-discrimination-ramps-up-fca-enforcement-directives</link><title>New Executive Order Targets Federal Contractor DEI Discrimination, Ramps Up FCA Enforcement Directives</title><description>The White House on March 26 issued an executive order titled Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors that continues the US administration’s focus on combating diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in the federal contractor space. The executive order is likely to impact all federal contractors and subcontractors, who should continue to partner with experienced counsel to understand and reduce their risks.</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>8095af47-7cb9-4bcb-acac-5b643bc1198c</guid><practice>White Collar Litigation &amp;amp; Government Investigations</practice><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>Government Contracts</practice><practice>Government Contractor Compliance</practice><practice>False Claims Act &amp; Qui Tam Litigation</practice><practice>Organizational Culture: Change &amp; Compliance</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBRRE</PGcodes><PGcodes>FDA</PGcodes><PGcodes>WTR</PGcodes><author>Lisa C. Dykstra</author><author>Sharon Perley Masling</author><author>Alexander B. Hastings</author><author>E. Pierce Blue</author><author>Jonathan Wilt</author><author>Margaret M. McDowell</author><author>Scott Whitman</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/03/competitor-collaborations-in-the-age-of-ai-ancillary-restraints-and-practical-antitrust-guardrails</link><title>Competitor Collaborations in the Age of AI: Ancillary Restraints and Practical Antitrust Guardrails, CPI Antitrust Chronicle</title><description>Partners Minna Naranjo and Rishi Satia, and associate Cole Pfeiffer co-authored an article for CPI Antitrust Chronicle examining how antitrust law applies to collaborations among competitors in the artificial intelligence (AI) sector.</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>7eb9baec-e5cc-4340-9d3b-a4b03adc6c0b</guid><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Antitrust &amp;amp; Competition</practice><practice>United States</practice><practice>Technology</practice><practice>Artificial Intelligence</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>ATR</PGcodes><author>Minna Lo Naranjo</author><author>Rishi P. Satia</author><author>Nicholas Pfeiffer </author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/03/ftc-practice-and-procedure-manual-third-edition-american-bar-association</link><title>FTC Practice and Procedure Manual, Third Edition , American Bar Association</title><description>Partners Joshua Goodman and Alice Hrdy, and associates Jordy Hur, Caiti Zeytoonian, Michael Fakhoury, and Leigha Beckman recently contributed to the American Bar Association Antitrust Law Section’s FTC Practice and Procedure Manual, Third Edition , the first new edition since 2014 of this practical reference guide to competition and consumer protection matters before the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>578d8ffd-655e-4afc-be16-8aca42a717f6</guid><practice>Antitrust &amp;amp; Competition</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>United States</practice><PGcodes>ATR</PGcodes><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><author>Joshua M. Goodman</author><author>Alice S. Hrdy</author><author>Jordy Hur</author><author>Caitlin Zeytoonian</author><author>Michael W. Fakhoury </author><author>Leigha M. Beckman</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/shiftingsandsoflaborlaw/2026/03/employment-disputes-and-arbitration-in-the-adgm-what-the-modus-operations-ruling-tells-us</link><title>Employment Disputes and Arbitration in the ADGM: What the Modus Operations Ruling Tells Us</title><description>A recent decision of the Abu Dhabi Global Market Court of First Instance provides useful guidance on how employment disputes may be treated when an employment contract contains an arbitration clause. In Mathonnet v Modus Operations LLC and Ayotte v Modus Operations LLC [2025] ADGMCFI 0005, the Court of First Instance confirmed that employment claims can in principle be referred to arbitration, even where the ADGM courts would otherwise have jurisdiction over the dispute.</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>ba29cb15-77e3-495d-b833-0a67cea2f03d</guid><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>Middle East</practice><practice>United Arab Emirates</practice><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><author>Rebecca Ford</author><author>Lisa Merod</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/shiftingsandsoflaborlaw/2026/03/managing-employees-in-the-middle-east-during-the-current-crisis</link><title>Managing Employees in the Middle East During the Current Crisis</title><description>The ongoing geopolitical events in the Middle East are creating significant operational and workforce challenges for employers across the region. While the legal framework in jurisdictions such as the UAE, KSA, and other GCC countries has not fundamentally changed in response to the current crisis, the application of existing employment laws in a crisis context raises a number of important considerations.</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>89dee6f3-6c64-452a-9d1f-69492e5643f0</guid><practice>Labor, Employment &amp;amp; Benefits</practice><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Crisis Management</practice><practice>Middle East</practice><PGcodes>EB</PGcodes><PGcodes>LBR</PGcodes><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><author>Rebecca Ford</author><author>Lisa Merod</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/blogs/sourcingatmorganlewis/2026/03/saudi-arabia-cloud-compliance-part-1-data-residency-and-contractual-expectations</link><title>Saudi Arabia Cloud Compliance Part 1: Data Residency and Contractual Expectations</title><description>Saudi Arabia’s cloud and data protection framework is substantive, cross-sectoral, and still maturing, creating a dynamic environment for technology companies entering the region. The threshold challenge is not merely identifying the applicable rules but truly understanding how multiple overlapping frameworks interact and where regulatory gaps require considered judgment in the absence of published guidance.</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>01de3e87-f0bf-4ccc-90d3-ad875cafd5e5</guid><practice>Technology Transactions, Outsourcing &amp;amp; Commercial Contracts</practice><practice>Corporate, Finance &amp;amp; Investment Management</practice><practice>Middle East</practice><practice>Saudi Arabia</practice><practice>Technology</practice><PGcodes>OUT</PGcodes><PGcodes>CBT</PGcodes><author>Doneld G. Shelkey</author><author>Alena Neskoromyuk</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/03/fdas-promising-new-framework-for-rare-genetic-diseases</link><title>FDA’s Promising New Framework for Rare Genetic Diseases, JAMA Health Forum</title><description>Partner Maarika Kimbrell co-authored an article in JAMA Health Forum , alongside former US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, examining the FDA’s draft framework for individualized gene and RNA therapies for rare genetic diseases and its implications for regulatory strategy and compliance.</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>d118fa00-b3a4-4f97-bedf-0d2bc4faa659</guid><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>FDA &amp;amp; Healthcare</practice><practice>Administrative Law &amp;amp; Federal Agencies</practice><practice>Government Solutions</practice><practice>Healthcare</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><PGcodes>FDA</PGcodes><author>Maarika L. Kimbrell</author></item><item><link>https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/03/federal-lawsuit-challenges-californias-truth-in-recycling-law-as-compliance-deadline-nears</link><title>Federal Lawsuit Challenges California’s ‘Truth in Recycling’ Law as Compliance Deadline Nears</title><description>A group of plaintiffs representing various trade associations and industry groups filed a lawsuit on March 17, 2026 challenging the constitutionality of California’s “Truth in Recycling” law, which is set to take effect on October 4, 2026.</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:00:00 -0500</pubDate><body></body><guid>e35003f5-b76e-4c72-89a3-224683d3d666</guid><practice>Litigation, Regulation &amp;amp; Investigations</practice><practice>Environmental Counseling &amp;amp; Litigation</practice><practice>State Attorneys General</practice><PGcodes>LIT</PGcodes><author>Duke K. McCall, III</author><author>Drew Cleary Jordan</author><author>Felipe Rigaudeau-Lopez</author></item></channel></rss>