Sujal J. Shah
Sujal J. Shah represents clients in antitrust litigation and counseling matters. He works on matters at the intersection of technology and competition regulation, advising clients on technology platforms, two-sided markets, technological tying, agentic commerce, AI, and algorithmic pricing. His work is centered on complex monopolization, tying, and price-fixing litigation, including class actions, working closely with experts on the economic theories in the case. He is rated by Chambers USA, which notes that “Sujal is a top-notch lawyer who always strives to find pragmatic solutions to complex problems.”
Sujal represents clients in a broad range of industries, with a particular focus on technology products and services, including technology platforms, internet services, microprocessors, flash memory, credit card processing, wireless communication services, and telecommunications hardware and networking equipment.
In addition to his antitrust experience, Sujal has worked on appellate cases concerning products liability and regulated industries. He has also worked extensively on pro bono matters, including representing an inmate on death row, challenging a state law on Equal Protection grounds, and challenging the scope of consular immunity regarding wage and hour claims.
Before joining Morgan Lewis, Sujal was a partner in the antitrust and trade regulation practice of another international law firm.
- In re Google Play Antitrust Litigation – Representing Google in connection with federal and state antitrust claims, including claims brought by State AGs and putative consumer and developer class plaintiffs
- Diva Limousine v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al. – Represented Uber in connection with unfair competition law claims
- Desoto Cab Company, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al. – Represented Uber in connection with attempted monopolization claims
- American Cricket Premier League, LLC v. USA Cricket et al. – Represented USA Cricket in connection with bid-rigging and attempted monopolization claims
- In re Intel Corporation Microprocessor Antitrust Litigation — Representing Intel in putative nationwide class actions
- In re Flash Memory Antitrust Litigation — Representing defendant in putative direct and indirect purchaser class actions under the Sherman and Cartwright Acts
- Visa USA, Inc. v. First Data ― Represented First Data in connection with Sherman Act counterclaims; see 2006 US Dist LEXIS 18482 (N.D. Cal.)
- Jung v. Association of American Medical Colleges et al. ― Represented hospital group in connection with Sherman Act conspiracy claims
- Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County v. Dynegy Power Marketing, Inc. ― Represented energy company against state antitrust and unfair competition claims, see 384 F.3d 756 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 125 S. Ct. 2957 (US)
- Duke University, 1998, Bachelor of Arts
- Yale Law School, 2001, Juris Doctor
- California
- US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- US District Court for the Central District of California
- US District Court for the Eastern District of California
- US District Court for the Northern District of California
- Supreme Court of the United States
Recommended, Antitrust: Civil litigation/class actions: defense, The Legal 500 US (2026)
Ranked, Antitrust, California, Chambers USA (2025, 2026)
Top Antitrust Lawyer (California), Daily Journal (2024)
Member, Practice Group of the Year, Competition, Law360 (2017–2021)
Recognized, Benchmark Litigation Top Litigator Under 40 (2017–2018)
Recognized, Under 40 Hot List, Benchmark Litigation (2016)
State Bar of California, Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section
American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law
Co-president, South Asian Bar Association of Northern California (2010–2011)
Co-chair, Civil Rights Committee and Board member, South Asian Bar Association of Northern California (2009–2010)
Jack W. Londen Award, Lawyer’s Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area
Bingham McCutchen, Keta Taylor Colby Pro Bono Award (2009)