Emily J. Dupraz
Emily J. Dupraz represents clients in environmental litigation, regulatory compliance and enforcement, and permitting. She advocates for clients in litigation brought by and against environmental agencies and private parties under federal and state environmental laws and in regulatory proceedings. Emily’s matters regularly involve CERCLA, RCRA, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, NEPA, and state equivalents. Emily is a problem solver, approaching cases with a practical, strategic mindset focused on achieving the best result for her clients.
In litigation, Emily represents clients in CERCLA cost-recovery and contribution litigation in both federal and state courts, including cases involving claims for natural resource damages. She also defends against environmental torts due to potential exposures to hazardous substances on land, in water, and in the air. Emily regularly works with technical experts to develop effective defenses grounded in science. She also counsels clients on potential litigation risk from unique exposure scenarios and emerging contaminants, such as contamination from land application of industrial biosolids containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).
Emily routinely helps clients investigate policies and practices presenting environmental regulatory risks and implement mitigation strategies. Her experience in enforcement matters includes representing clients in negotiations with US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regions 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 and with regulators in a dozen different states to achieve settlements with significant penalty reductions.
Emily also represents energy clients in project counseling and construction litigation, including matters involving defective work and equipment. She has also counseled clients in matters involving permit challenges to controversial infrastructure projects. In public dealings, Emily leverages her background in communications and speechwriting to emphasize project strengths while addressing key community concerns.
Emily maintains an active pro bono practice and serves on the board of trustees for two nonprofit organizations that work to provide vital social services.
- Represents former metal plating manufacturer in natural resource damage litigation brought by the State of New Jersey in Camden County, New Jersey
- Achieved complete dismissal of plaintiffs’ complaint for electronics manufacturer in toxic tort litigation involving groundwater contamination, with claims brought under RCRA’s citizen suit provision, Massachusetts G.L. c. 21E, and common law tort theories of recovery, in the District of Massachusetts
- Represented telecommunications company in responding to potential litigation and regulatory enforcement due to lead contamination, including conducting comprehensive investigation of historical company policies and procedures
- Represented metal plating manufacturer in negotiating a consent decree with EPA and implementing a groundwater remedy at a Superfund Site in Puerto Rico
- Represents group of potentially responsible parties in negotiations with EPA and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) to achieve a cost-effective remedy that is protective of human health and the environment on Superfund site in New Jersey
- Counseled a biotech organization on regulated medical waste disposal regulations in Virginia, including permitting a waste treatment facility and self-reporting regulatory violations under a state immunity statute
- Counseled a grocery store chain on compliance with state laws banning plastics and polystyrene foam containers
- Represented paper manufacturer in responding to toxic tort litigation arising from land application of industrial biosolids containing PFAS in Maine, including comprehensive investigation of historical use and handling of PFAS*
- Represented an energy company in CERCLA equitable allocation arbitration proceeding related to contamination from a former manufactured gas plant in Michigan, resulting in a favorable settlement for the client after over a decade of active litigation*
- Represented energy company on permitting controversial transmission line construction project in Maine, including obtaining necessary federal, state, and local land use permits, defending permit appeals, and counseling on compliance with permit terms throughout construction*
- Counseled paper company on environmental regulatory compliance at two paper mills in Michigan after major black liquor spill into adjacent waterway and prior to potential corporate transaction, including leading a team of consultants on a multiweek environmental compliance audit and investigating relevant corporate policies and practices*
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
*Indicates matters handled prior to Morgan Lewis
- Vermont Law School, 2013, J.D., magna cum laude
- Vermont Law School, 2013, Master's, environmental law and policy, summa cum laude
- 哈佛学院, 2005, A.B., government, cum laude
- Massachusetts
- Maine
- Pennsylvania
- New Jersey
- Michigan
- US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
- US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
- US District Court for the District of Maine
- US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
- US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
- US District Court for the District of New Jersey
- US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
- Clerkship to Justice Faustino J. Fernandez-Vina of the Supreme Court of New Jersey (2016 - 2017)
- Clerkship to Judge Lois H. Goodman of the US District Court for the District of New Jersey (2015 - 2016)
- Clerkship to Assignment Judge Mary C. Jacobson of the Superior Court of New Jersey (2014 - 2015)
Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, Ones to Watch, Environmental Law, Boston (2021–2025)
Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, Ones to Watch, Land Use and Zoning Law, Boston (2021–2025)
Co-Chair, Boston Bar Association Hazardous and Solid Waste Committee (2025–present)
National Champion, National Environmental Law Moot Court Competition (2013)
No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. A description of the selection methodology for the above awards can be found here.