Mark Donatiello

• Represented a US territory in a cost recovery action against the United States under CERCLA for claims related to the United States’ historic ownership and operation of the territory’s only municipal dump. Obtained summary judgment on liability in bifurcated proceedings. The case ultimately resolved a circuit split on CERCLA Section 113 contribution action statute of limitations triggers in the US Supreme Court, and resulted in an initial settlement on past costs of nearly $50 million.
• Represented the owner of a former petroleum refinery site in a two-decade-long state enforcement action to abate a nuisance caused by historic contamination of the facility. Brought action for state law contribution claims on behalf of client against the owners of historic pipelines that crossed and contaminated the facility. Obtained favorable settlements from third parties totaling more than $50 million following significant victories in summary judgment motion practice. Contamination included hydrocarbon plumes, arsenic, chromium, and other metals, volatile organic compound (VOCs), and semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs).
• Represented the owner of a former industrial facility in reaching settlement with a state environmental enforcement agency for site remediation. Also represented that owner in a CERCLA Section 113 contribution action against all other potentially responsible parties. Won summary judgment on liability against prior owners and operators of the facility in bifurcated proceedings. Damages expected to exceed $250 million.
• Represented multiple refining industry parties in what was termed on appeal as “the largest CERCLA case ever.” Obtained summary judgment from federal district court on operator liability at 12 sites across the country, stemming from US government control over industry facilities during World War II.
• Represented pipeline owner and operator in action brought by landowner alleging pipeline leak had caused $90 million in damages to ranch property. In expert-intensive proceeding, obtained summary judgment in federal district court due to lack of injury and lack of causation.
• Assisted clients in responding to and addressing emerging regulations related to per- and polyfluoroalkylated substances (PFAS), including on site-specific sampling plan orders, investigation plans, and other agency submissions. Advised multiple industry parties in assessing potential liability and legal options related to PFAS and PFAS-containing products. Represented clients as both a plaintiff recovering costs of cleanup and in defending against enforcement and third-party claims.
• Assisted multiple trade groups in drafting comments packages submitted to the US Environmental Protection Agency related to proposed PFAS regulations and rulemakings. Reviewed and commented on deficiencies from numerous scientific studies that formed basis of PFAS regulatory proposals for CERCLA hazardous designation, RCRA hazardous designation, and proposed Maximum Contaminant Levels. Also assisted trade groups on comments related to the Renewable Fuel Standard, Endangered Species Act, and RCRA recycling exceptions. Assisted in amicus briefing for trade groups challenging PFAS hazardous substance CERCLA designation in litigation.
• Advised and assisted client in developing initial litigation defense strategy and federal court removal arguments in multi-billion-dollar climate litigation.
  • Assisted in defense against CERCLA contribution claims by a large PRP group for a Maryland landfill. Plaintiffs asserted claims against our client based on arranger liability for alleged disposal related to historic beverage manufacturing operations. Matter was favorably resolved through settlement.
  • Represented large social media and technology company in a series of high-profile arbitrations related to labor and employment disputes surrounding acquisition of company by new owner.
  • Represented multiple banks and financial service companies in various commercial disputes, including defending claims related to contract disputes and allegations of fraud and unfair credit and lending practices.

Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.