Rick R. Rothman

Rick has experience in counseling clients in a number of different contexts, including threatened enforcement actions, variance requests, permitting and appeals, due diligence reviews, and meeting state and federal reporting requirements and warning requirements.

Rick’s litigation practice involves the representation of clients from large corporations to local agencies in matters before both federal and state courts. He has litigated cases addressing alleged violations of most of the major environmental statutes, as well as cases involving alleged common law violations and injuries arising from exposures to products and chemicals regulated by those statutes. His recent case load has included Clean Air Act enforcement matters both criminal and civil, Superfund actions, criminal and civil enforcement of waste disposal requirements, Clean Water Act discharges, Proposition 65 enforcement actions, multimedia enforcement actions, and chemical exposure complaints.

Rick has also applied his environmental experience in the appellate context. He has represented clients in both state and federal courts of appeal, including a Clean Air Act case before the Ninth Circuit and a Proposition 65 case before the California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District.

Prior to joining Morgan Lewis, Rick was a partner in the environmental practice of another international law firm, where he served as a practice group leader and office managing partner of the Los Angeles office. 

• Representing a North America refining company concerning its response to the US Environmental Protection Agency’s renewed efforts relating to its New Source Review (NSR) refinery initiative enforcement
• Representing a manufacturer of advanced materials concerning an Environmental Protection Agency investigation of the company’s facility under the Clean Air Act permitting
• Representing a global leader in the paper and packaging industry in Superfund litigation and regulatory negotiations with EPA
• Representing the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District with respect to the District’s efforts to defend its promulgation of new regulations addressing the control of particulate matter sources
• Representing a chemical manufacturer in challenging the listing of certain chemicals by the State of California as carcinogens under Proposition 65