SEC approves FINRA rule designed to protect seniors and other specified adults from financial exploitation.
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has approved a new rule proposed by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) to protect seniors and other specified adults from financial exploitation. Once it takes effect on February 5, 2018, FINRA Rule 2165 and its accompanying amendments to the recordkeeping requirements in FINRA Rule 4512 will:
According to FINRA, approximately 10,000 Americans will turn 65 every day over the next decade, with their investments accounting for more than 75 percent of all financial assets in the United States. These assets, coupled with rising life expectancies and the potential cognitive effects of the normal aging process, make seniors a prime target for financial exploitation. As the elderly population continues to grow rapidly, the financial services sector can expect a significant increase in elder financial exploitation attempts. Regulators view financial professionals as a first line of defense against threats to this vulnerable group of investors. Both FINRA and the SEC have identified senior financial exploitation as examination priorities.
New FINRA Rule 2165, combined with the amendment to FINRA Rule 4512, addresses what has become a hot-button topic in recent years on both federal and state levels. FINRA’s action follows legislative actions in a number of states intended to protect senior citizens and other vulnerable adults from financial exploitation. More than 20 states currently require broker-dealers and others to file reports with a state agency or law enforcement entity if there is a reasonable belief that a senior or other at-risk adult is being or has been financially exploited. Some states’ laws provide for mandatory training or procedures with respect to filing these reports. The threshold age for defining a senior varies across states.
More recently, some states have adopted a law or rule based on the 2016 North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) model “Act to Protect Vulnerable Adults from Financial Exploitation” (NASAA Model Act). Some of these states permit broker-dealers to implement a temporary asset hold in the event of a report of exploitation, but not all of them permit notice to be provided to third parties (e.g., a family member) when an asset hold is put in place.
Collection of Trusted Contact Person Information
FINRA Rule 4512, which concerns recordkeeping, was amended to require that as part of the account opening and routine and customary updating process, a broker-dealer must make a reasonable effort to collect the name of a Trusted Contact Person from an account holder. The broker-dealer must provide written disclosure that it may disclose information to the Trusted Contact Person about the customer’s account to address possible financial exploitation and confirm specifics of the customer’s current contact information, health status, or the identity of any legal guardian, executor, trustee or power of attorney. Electronic disclosure would satisfy the requirement, both for new and existing accounts. Broker-dealers are permitted, but not required, to notify the Trusted Contact Person of the designation.
FINRA does not specify the contact information to be gathered, but this would generally include a phone number, email address, and mailing address. FINRA indicated in its proposal that merely asking a customer to provide this information would satisfy the reasonable effort requirement. The inability to collect the information, if requested, would not prevent a broker-dealer from opening and maintaining an account for the customer.
Commenters requested clarification that obligation to obtain Trusted Contact Person information for existing accounts would be satisfied when the member updated the account within the 36-month period required by SEC Rule 17a-3. FINRA’s response to comments noted that the update requirement may be triggered earlier than the 36-month period if the member updates the information on the account either in the course of the member’s routine and customary business or as otherwise required by applicable law or rules.
Temporary Holds on Disbursements
New FINRA Rule 2165 provides a safe harbor for a broker-dealer and its associated persons in certain circumstances if a broker-dealer puts a temporary hold on disbursements if financial exploitation of a Specified Adult is suspected. A Specified Adult is
Financial exploitation means
|obtain control, through deception, intimidation or undue influence, over the Specified Adult’s money, assets or property; or
|convert the Specified Adult’s money, assets or property
Broker-dealers are permitted, but not required, to place a temporary hold on a disbursement of funds or securities from the Account of a Specified Adult under the following circumstances:
The broker-dealer may place a temporary hold on a disbursement of funds or securities for up to 25 business days when the requirements of the rule listed above are met, unless the hold is otherwise terminated or extended by the appropriate state regulator or agency (e.g., a state securities regulator or state adult protective services agency), or by a court of competent jurisdiction. Of course, FINRA encourages its members to attempt to resolve the issue without a hold, unless the member reasonably believes that doing so would cause further harm to the Specified Adult.
FINRA notes that a broker-dealer’s reasonable belief that financial exploitation of a Specified Adult is or may be occurring may be based on the facts and circumstances observed in the broker-dealer’s business relationship with the Specified Adult.
Holds on Transactions Not Permitted
The permitted temporary hold does not apply to transactions in securities. Accordingly, the rule does not provide a basis to refuse to follow a customer instruction to liquidate a position, but it does authorize a broker-dealer to refuse to follow a subsequent instruction to disburse the proceeds from the account in accordance with the provision described above.
Holds on ACATS Permitted
FINRA noted that for purposes of Rule 2165, it would consider disbursements to include automated customer account transfers via ACATS, noting that as with any other temporary hold, the member must have a reasonable belief of financial exploitation in order to hold the processing.
Written Supervisory Procedures
FINRA Rule 2165 requires broker-dealers that wish to avail themselves of the safe harbor to establish and maintain related written supervisory procedures (WSPs). The required WSPs must include procedures to identify, escalate and report matters relating to financial exploitation of Specified Adults.
The WSPs must also identify the title of each associated person of the broker-dealer who is authorized to place, terminate or extend a temporary hold on behalf of the broker-dealer. Associated persons with this authority must serve in a supervisory, compliance or legal capacity for the broker-dealer.
Broker-dealers should also monitor for requests by customers to make changes to their designated Trusted Contact Persons, which may itself be a sign of potential financial exploitation – for example, a Specified Adult seeking to change the Trusted Contact Person from an immediate family member to a third party that is not known to the broker-dealer.
Broker-dealers would be required to develop and document training policies or programs reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the requirements of new FINRA Rule 2165. FINRA noted that members have discretion in determining how best to structure training. FINRA and several states have published related training materials.
Broker-dealers would be required to retain records relating to their obligations and actions under the rule, including
FINRA noted that a broker-dealer’s disclosure of information to a Trusted Contact Person pursuant to Rule 2165 would be consistent with the Regulation S-P exception for disclosures to comply with federal, state, or local laws, rules and other applicable legal requirements. As support, FINRA cites to prior Interagency Guidance issued by the SEC and other federal financial regulators in 2013 that “clarifies that reporting suspected financial abuse of older adults to appropriate local, state, or federal agencies does not, in general, violate the privacy provisions of the [Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act] or its implementing regulations,” which include Regulation S-P. That guidance further notes another exemption that may be available to a financial institution to disclose nonpublic personal information to protect against or prevent actual or potential fraud, unauthorized transactions, claims, or other liability.
FINRA urges broker-dealers to use discretion in disclosing information to the Trusted Contact Person, including
FINRA also cautions broker-dealers to consider potential applicable non-US privacy requirements when determining whether to place a temporary hold on a customer’s Account.
Identifying an Appropriate State Agency for Reporting
Although some commenters argued that FINRA should mandate reporting of senior exploitation, FINRA declined to do so. Nonetheless, some state laws already mandate reporting of senior exploitation, and almost all others expressly permit it. FINRA noted that it would expect members to comply with all state reporting and other requirements and may request related records during the examination process.
One practical question that may arise is how broker-dealers identify the appropriate state agency to which they can report potential financial exploitation. State procedures vary widely. In many states, reports are submitted to the Adult Protective Services agency. In others, reports are either permitted or required to be made to other agencies, such as local law enforcement, or more recently (in keeping with the NASAA Model Act) to the state securities regulator.
Requirements for Self-Directed and Electronic Accounts
FINRA notes in the proposal that a broker-dealer’s reasonable belief that financial exploitation of a Specified Adult is or may be occurring may be based on the facts and circumstances observed in the broker-dealer’s business relationship with the Specified Adult. The opportunity for such observations is clear in a traditional brokerage relationship that involves in-person and telephone interaction with the client. Less clear is how such facts and circumstances may be observed when the business relationship involves self-directed and electronic accounts.
If you have any questions or would like more information on the issues discussed in this LawFlash, please contact any of the following Morgan Lewis lawyers:
Amy Natterson Kroll
 Based on comments received in response to the proposal, FINRA extended the implementation deadline to 12 months after SEC approval instead of the original 6-month period that was proposed.
 The term “Account” would mean any account of a broker-dealer for which a “Specified Adult” has the authority to transact business. Institutional accounts are excluded.
 The SEC Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations recently published its Examination Priorities for 2017. FINRA also recently published its 2017 Annual Regulatory and Examination Priorities Letter.
 See, e.g., Ala. Code §§ 8-6 et seq. (2016).
 La. R.S. § 51:725 et seq. (2016).