The Biden administration suspended certain sanctions on the Government of Venezuela, including some impacting Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. (PdVSA), on October 18, 2023. This significant, albeit currently temporary, change in the sanctions program follows the signing of an electoral roadmap agreement between the Maduro government and Venezuela’s Unitary Platform, the opposition coalition.
The US Office of Foreign Assets Control’s (OFAC’s) Venezuela-Related Sanctions program began in 2015 with the signing of Executive Order (EO) 13692 by US President Barack Obama. The EO, which implemented the Venezuela Defense of Human Rights and Civil Society Act of 2014, targets specific persons and entities determined to be responsible for certain malign activities, including those that undermine Venezuelan democratic processes or institutions.
The sanctions program peaked in August 2019 with US President Donald Trump’s “maximum pressure” approach, which saw the signing of EO 13884, imposing blocking sanctions on the Government of Venezuela.[1] EO 13884 built on several other EOs including EO 13850, which placed sanctions on the oil sector and PdVSA, and EO 13808, which imposed restrictions on transactions with Venezuelan debt, bonds, and other securities. Many of the sanctions were applicable to non-US persons, including those on certain Government of Venezuela entities, including PdVSA, and the oil and gold sector.
The current suspension of the sanctions occurred through the issuance of three new general licenses (GLs) and the amendment of three existing GLs. In conjunction with those GLs, OFAC issued a guidance document and two new FAQs and amended four existing FAQS.
The three new GLs consist of the following:
OFAC amended three GLs as follows:
Importantly, OFAC has made clear that this sanctions relief is contingent on the Maduro regime upholding its obligations under the electoral roadmap. For example, the United States expects the Maduro government to define a specific timeline and process for the expedited treatment of all candidates before the end of November 2023. The United States also expects the Maduro regime to begin the release of wrongfully detained political prisoners.
These actions are preliminary to the actual conduct of free and fair elections in Venezuela, and presumably the Biden administration will require continued progress and adherence to such elections as a condition for continuing the relief or any further easing of sanctions. Without adherence to these commitments, OFAC is “prepared to revoke these authorizations.”
With the exception of the limited sanctions imposed through EO 13692, the Venezuela-Related Sanctions program has been implemented through executive action and, accordingly, the US Congress’s current ability to restrict or slow the lifting of sanctions is limited.
To bridge the gap, just a day before the suspension of the sanctions was announced, Florida Senator Marco Rubio introduced a bill (S. 3053), the Preempting Misguided Appeasement and Financing of Stabilizing Regimes Act of 2023, seeking to give Congress a role in any future decision to lift Venezuelan sanctions. If it becomes law, the bill would prohibit the importation of Venezuelan (and Iranian) crude oil, petroleum, petroleum products, and liquified natural gas into the United States.
The seven co-sponsors of Senator Rubio’s bill insist that it is integral to national security. The sponsors emphasize the importance of American energy independence, particularly from Venezuela and Iran. The senators also commended this proposed bill as a long-overdue step toward bolstering growth in domestic oil production and energy-sector jobs.
Finally, they made clear the bill’s intention to formalize the exclusion of certain countries from critical US supply chains and thereby strengthen the security of American energy infrastructure. Nevertheless, passing such legislation will likely be an uphill battle given the split control of Congress, the narrow majorities, and the logjam of upcoming “must-pass” legislation.
If you have any questions or would like more information on the issues discussed in this LawFlash, please contact any of the following:
[1] EO 13884 defined the “Government of Venezuela” to mean “the state and Government of Venezuela[;] any political subdivision, agency, or instrumentality thereof, including the Central Bank of Venezuela and Petroleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PdVSA)[;] any person owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the foregoing[;] and any person who has acted or purported to act directly or indirectly for or on behalf of, any of the foregoing, including as a member of the Maduro regime.”
[2] OFAC simultaneously made clear that these actions are not meant to affect its posture on creditor litigation relating to the Government of Venezuela, citing FAQs 808, 1123, and 1124.