LawFlash

OSHA Sharpens Enforcement Tools with New Initiatives

January 30, 2023

The federal safety agency recently unveiled new initiatives aimed at “impactful enforcement . . . in the form of increased citations and penalties.” Changes to how the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) uses subpoenas, issues instance-by-instance citations, and groups violations will directly impact employers.

New Subpoena Regulation Looms on Horizon

The federal safety agency intends to adopt a regulation in June 2023 addressing the use of subpoenas during OSHA investigations. Currently no draft of the proposed regulation is available to the public. Because OSHA has proposed the new regulation as an interim final rule (IFR), it will take effect without prior public input. IFRs are generally only used when an agency has good reason for not following the usual rulemaking process, e.g., in a time-sensitive situation. OSHA has not publicized its reasons for attempting to avail itself of the IFR procedures. Once the IFR is published, the agency will likely then solicit public comment, albeit while the regulation is already in effect.

In support of the regulation, OSHA points to “recurrent issues” that “lead to time-consuming disputes between the agency and employers.” The new regulation purportedly seeks to “provide helpful clarity to the agency and the regulated public . . . while promoting . . . uniform subpoena practice across the agency.” However, it is unclear what “recurrent issues” led to the creation of a new regulation, and the OSHA Field Operations Manual (FOM) already provides precise guidelines related to subpoenas served by OSHA.

One change that would likely be welcome to employers is an increase in the number of days an employer is given to provide documents in response to a subpoena. The FOM states OSHA subpoenas should “normally allow five working days” for the production of responsive material, but such a short turnaround time makes it very difficult for employers to retain counsel, gather/review documents, and provide a suitable response.

Depending on the actual text of the IFR, it is possible employers may see an increase in subpoenas issued by OSHA as part of the agency’s investigations.

Expanded Circumstances Giving Rise to ‘Instance-by-Instance’ Citations

Under a new policy that goes into effect in late March 2023, OSHA will allow “instance-by-instance” (IBI) citations to be issued in cases where the agency identifies "high-gravity" serious violations of OSHA standards. According to OSHA, these cases include “lockout/tagout, machine guarding, permit-required confined space, respiratory protection, falls, trenching and for cases with other-than-serious violations specific to recordkeeping.” Previously, IBI citations could only be issued for alleged willful violations that the agency classified as egregious.

A decision to issue an IBI citation under the new policy will “normally” include consideration of the following factors:

  • The employer has received a willful, repeat, or failure to abate violation within the last five years where that classification is current
  • The employer has failed to report a fatality, inpatient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye pursuant to the requirements of 29 CFR 1904.39
  • The proposed citations are related to a fatality/catastrophe
  • The proposed recordkeeping citations are related to injury or illness that occurred as a result of a serious hazard

This expansion of violations that OSHA considers egregious may lead to increased fines for employers. According to OSHA, this change is needed to discourage noncompliance and “ensure OSHA personnel are applying the full authority of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.”

Increase in Decisions Not to Group Violations Likely

OSHA also issued a separate memorandum reminding regional administrators and area directors of their authority “to not group violations in appropriate cases to achieve a deterrent effect.” According to OSHA, citing violations separately is a way to “more effectively encourage employers to comply with the intent of the OSH Act.”

The memorandum directs that in cases where grouping multiple violations will not “elevate the gravity or classification and resulting penalty,” such violations should not be grouped if the evidence allows for separate citations. OSHA personnel are also directed that “discretion may be used to cite separately” even where an existing directive encourages grouping.

Takeaways for Employers

OSHA appears poised to step up its investigation and enforcement activity against employers in the coming months.

Employers should watch for further updates about the subpoena IFR, and should retain counsel as early as possible for any OSHA investigation. Retaining skilled legal counsel early to assist with navigating an OSHA investigation and/or citation should be top of mind for any employer, especially those in industries OSHA heavily targets for enforcement activity.

Navigating the NEXT.

Sharing insights and resources that help our clients prepare for and address evolving issues is a hallmark of Morgan Lewis. To that end, we maintain a resource center with access to tools and perspectives on timely topics driven by current events such as the global public health crisis, economic uncertainty, and geopolitical dynamics. Find resources on how to cope with the globe’s ever-changing business, social, and political landscape at Navigating the NEXT. to stay up to date on developments as they unfold. Subscribe now if you would like to receive a digest of new updates to these resources.

Contacts

If you have any questions or would like more information on the issues discussed in this LawFlash, please contact any of the following:

Los Angeles
Philadelphia