Tech & Sourcing @ Morgan Lewis

A company licenses an artificial intelligence–enabled service after evaluating its functionality, security, performance, and compliance characteristics. Six months later, the provider upgrades the underlying model or replaces it altogether. The product may look the same, but the technology beneath it may have changed in ways that affect performance, data processing, regulatory compliance, or the customer’s downstream obligations.

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in development services, outsourcing arrangements, and other commercial and technology transactions, customers and vendors are confronting a deceptively simple question: How should risk be allocated when a deliverable is created using AI?

Join intellectual property (IP) partner Colleen Ganin for Fashioning the Law: A Panel Discussion and Q&A, presented by Volunteer Lawyers for the Arts and Morgan Lewis. Colleen will be joined by Ayisha Morgan, General Counsel of Elite World Group, and David Eshmoili, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of David Yurman, for a discussion of the legal and business issues shaping the fashion industry, from brand protection and intellectual property to the growing impact of AI on fashion and creative businesses.

Modern brand partnerships raise contract questions around exclusivity, reputational risk, how influencer and celebrity content can be used after it is posted, and how the parties will measure performance. Part 2 of this Contract Corner series examines how parties can address those issues in their agreements.

Brand partnerships are expanding beyond traditional sponsorships and celebrity endorsements into arrangements that can combine licensing, content creation, product development, distribution, and data sharing. As those relationships become more complex, contracts need to clearly define the partnership, control of brand assets, and what happens to jointly created materials when the relationship ends.

Signing up for a streaming service might be faster than choosing what to watch, with only a few taps unlocking a month of movies, a season of sports, or enough airline Wi-Fi to make a long flight feel shorter. That convenience, however, rests on a recurring contract that may continue after the vacation ends, change price while it remains in effect, and provide less control over content than the word “subscription” suggests.

Join partners Alexander Hastings, Amanda Robinson, and Jaclyn Whittaker, on Tuesday, June 16, 2026 at 12:00 pm ET for a webinar discussing key considerations for startups and established companies when contracting with the government.

Please join partner Marie Davy and of counsel Emily Lowe on Thursday, April 30, 2026 from 12:00 to 1:00 pm ET for a discussion on current issues and key contractual provisions in global distribution agreements. Topics will include territory and exclusivity, compliance, and intellectual property protection.

World Intellectual Property Day on April 26, 2026 provides a timely lens through which to examine the increasingly complex role that intellectual property (IP) and commercial rights play across the sports industry. Far beyond traditional questions of trademark, copyright, patent, and design protection, the modern sports ecosystem is shaped by layered rights and contractual structures governing athlete branding, sponsorships, media distribution, data, venue technology, and emerging artificial intelligence (AI)-driven uses.

While stadium naming rights agreements have traditionally focused on the core commercial points one would expect—category exclusivity, signage rights, use of trademarks, media integration, hospitality benefits—as more stadiums host global events such as the FIFA World Cup and the Olympics, temporary obscuring signage language has become an increasingly important consideration in naming rights negotiations.