Tech & Sourcing @ Morgan Lewis

A company licenses an artificial intelligence–enabled service after evaluating its functionality, security, performance, and compliance characteristics. Six months later, the provider upgrades the underlying model or replaces it altogether. The product may look the same, but the technology beneath it may have changed in ways that affect performance, data processing, regulatory compliance, or the customer’s downstream obligations.

When an M&A transaction closes, the buyer will typically be unable to stand up its own IT environment on day one. In this scenario, the seller often continues operating existing IT systems, provides access to employees who understand them, and delivers data needed for the transition for a period after closing to assist the buyer in eventually operating a standalone IT environment of its own.

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in development services, outsourcing arrangements, and other commercial and technology transactions, customers and vendors are confronting a deceptively simple question: How should risk be allocated when a deliverable is created using AI?

Modern brand partnerships raise contract questions around exclusivity, reputational risk, how influencer and celebrity content can be used after it is posted, and how the parties will measure performance. Part 2 of this Contract Corner series examines how parties can address those issues in their agreements.

Brand partnerships are expanding beyond traditional sponsorships and celebrity endorsements into arrangements that can combine licensing, content creation, product development, distribution, and data sharing. As those relationships become more complex, contracts need to clearly define the partnership, control of brand assets, and what happens to jointly created materials when the relationship ends.

Signing up for a streaming service might be faster than choosing what to watch, with only a few taps unlocking a month of movies, a season of sports, or enough airline Wi-Fi to make a long flight feel shorter. That convenience, however, rests on a recurring contract that may continue after the vacation ends, change price while it remains in effect, and provide less control over content than the word “subscription” suggests.

A February 2026 IT disruption illustrates how technology dependencies can affect cruise operations. Carnival Cruise Line said the issue arose during planned maintenance and affected embarkation, disembarkation, and other technology tools. Reports of the disruption also identified impacts to Wi-Fi and the Carnival HUB app, while navigation and safety systems remained operational.

Flexibility versus certainty is an important and often challenging tradeoff throughout commercial contract negotiations, particularly regarding termination for convenience. Customers, mindful of shifting budgets, technological changes, and evolving business needs, want the freedom to walk away at their discretion. Vendors, mindful of upfront infrastructure investments, staffing needs, and revenue volatility, want a committed income stream. Reconciling these competing needs can become a significant sticking point, often arising later in the negotiation cycle after other issues have been settled.

The use of robotics in warehouses has become prevalent in the last few years. With improved software and the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), warehouse automation can handle inventory, shipping, and orders. Robotics can improve accuracy, be cost-effective, and optimize space, which can benefit both the warehouse operator and the customer. While the rise of robotics has changed the way warehousing services are performed, the terms and conditions of warehousing agreements have not always kept pace with the significant changes resulting from these developments.

In Part 1 of this Contract Corner, we discussed the renewed focus on resilience in outsourcing agreements for 2026 and how resilience is increasingly becoming a design requirement, not just an untested BCP. In Part 2 we look at how geopolitical pressures can quickly become delivery constraints and how many organizations are leveraging global capability centers as an anchor for critical knowledge and continuity, and provide a practical 90-day action plan and high-level contract checklist that deal teams can leverage during strategy planning.