NEWS FOR LAWYERS AND SOURCING PROFESSIONALS
As 2018 comes to a close, we have once again compiled all the links to our Contract Corner blog posts, a regular feature of Tech & Sourcing @ Morgan Lewis. In these posts, members of our global technology, outsourcing, and commercial transactions practice highlight particular contract provisions, review the issues, and propose negotiating and drafting tips. If you don’t see a topic you are interested in below, please let us know, and we may feature it in a future Contract Corner.
Join Morgan Lewis at our Boston office on Wednesday, December 6 for an interactive event on top issues impacting commercial and transactional lawyers and sourcing professionals. The event will kick off with a collaborative discussion on negotiations and strategies in commercial and technology transactions, followed by a presentation on ethical issues for transactional lawyers.
Morgan Lewis is hosting an interactive event regarding top issues impacting commercial and transactional lawyers and sourcing professionals on December 6 in Boston. The event will kick off with a collaborative discussion on negotiations and strategies in commercial and technology transactions, followed by a presentation on ethical issues for transactional lawyers. Morgan Lewis partner Don Shelkey, of counsel Emily Lowe, and senior attorney Ada Finkel will be speakers at the event.
Discussion topics will include the following:
- Current trends in commercial and technology contracts
- Commercial due diligence and transition service agreements
- Online presence management questions
- Ethics for lawyers on social media
The discussion will be followed by lunch and a networking reception. We hope to see you at the event!
A recent decision issued by United States District Court Judge Robert Scola found that the website of an owner and operator of a chain of regional grocery stores is subject to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) as a service of a public accommodation, and must be accessible to persons who are visually impaired. Gil v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. appears to be the first trial on the issue of whether a website is covered by Title III of the ADA.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently sent more than 90 letters to online “influencers”—including marketers, celebrities, and athletes—reminding them of the truth-in-advertising standards for endorsements and the FTC’s Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising (FTC Guides) applicable to such endorsements. In their May 2017 LawFlash, Morgan Lewis partners Rochelle Alpert and Karen Butcher examine the context of these letters and discuss common pitfalls and best practices to avoid scrutiny.
Geotargeting—delivering content to users based on their geographic location—has become a popular and effective marketing tool. Yet proper implementation may be more nuanced than originally contemplated because certain locations, like medical facilities, attract intense privacy fears.
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey recently announced a settlement of the commonwealth’s investigation of a digital advertising agency’s practice of establishing virtual fences (a/k/a geofencing) around reproductive health clinics and methadone clinics and then sending related third-party advertisements to mobile devices that had entered the virtual zone.
A seismic shift is afoot in the intelligence, complexity, and interconnectedness of everyday products, and the flimsy foundation of customer assent to standard terms will continue to crack, if not collapse. We recently noted some relatively straightforward adjustments that manufacturers can make to their standard terms to address issues related to e-commerce portals. The Internet of Things (IoT), however, could render the old contracting process (not just old products) obsolete. We highlight some challenging IoT contractual considerations below. A more comprehensive and academic treatment of the topic can be found here.
We get it. You sell widgets. You’ve always sold widgets. Your time-tested terms of sale/purchase have served you faithfully through product, industry, and economic cycles. You don’t sell apps or clouds, so why should this brave new digital world shake up your contracting process? If you have a portal or provide other electronic access to your counterparties, it’s probably time to dust off your trusty standard terms.
The Status Quote
Your process might be well established. You attach your standard terms to your purchase orders and invoices. You disclaim your warranties while making your suppliers promise the moon. Your potential liability is infinitesimal while you conveniently neglect to limit your counterparties’ liability. You include some magic “battle of the forms” language so that your favorable terms will prevail. All pretty standard practice thus far (if you haven’t gotten around to negotiating and executing formal supply agreements).
The Pennsylvania Bar Institute’s (PBI’s) annual Internet Law Update seminar will be held on March 28, 2017. This year’s seminar was planned by Morgan Lewis partner Peter Watt-Morse, and Morgan Lewis associates Eric Pennesi and Ben Klaber will join Peter on the faculty.
2017 marks the seminar’s 20th anniversary of providing practical information on the internet’s impact on legal and business issues. This year’s seminar will include a segment on the history of the internet and discussions on where the internet is headed, such as the Internet of Things (IoT) and block chain technology.
Other topics will include the following:
- Privacy, security, and cloud computing
- Copyrights, trademarks, patents, and e-contracting
- Social media and the First Amendment
The live seminar will take place from 9:00 am to 4:15 pm at the PBI Professional Development Conference Center, located at Heinz 57 Center, 339 Sixth Avenue, 7th Floor, Pittsburgh, PA 15222.
More information, including details on CLE credit, is available at the PBI website. We hope to see you at the seminar.