The US Securities and Exchange Commission proposed changes to the Customer Protection Rule, which would impact about 63 carrying broker-dealers and potentially require more frequent deposits into customer and PAB reserve bank accounts.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on July 12 proposed amendments to Rule 15c3-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require certain broker-dealers to increase the frequency with which they perform computations of the net cash they owe to customers and other broker-dealers from weekly to daily (Proposal). The Proposal would apply to carrying broker-dealers with average total credits (the amount of cash they owe customers and PAB account holders) equal to or greater than $250 million.
The public comment period will remain open for 60 days following publication of Proposal the SEC website or 30 days following publication in the Federal Register, whichever period is longer.
Rule 15c3-3—the Customer Protection Rule—protects customer cash and securities through two requirements: the cash reserve requirement and the possession or control requirement.
The first step, the possession or control requirement, requires broker-dealers to promptly obtain and maintain the physical possession or control of all fully paid and excess margin customer securities.
The second step, the cash reserve requirement, requires carrying broker-dealers to segregate all customer cash or money obtained from the use of customer property that has not been used to finance transactions of other customers.
This step further requires that a carrying broker-dealer maintain a reserve of cash or qualified securities in an account at a bank that is at least equal in value to the net cash owed to customers, including cash obtained from the use of customer securities. The account must be titled “Special Reserve Bank Account for the Exclusive Benefit of Customers.” The amount of net cash owed to customers is computed pursuant to a formula set forth in Rule 15c3-3a. Under that formula, the broker-dealer adds up customer credit items (e.g., cash in customer securities accounts and cash obtained through the use of customer margin securities) and then subtracts from that amount customer debit items (e.g., margin loans).
If credit items exceed debit items, the net amount must be on deposit in the customer reserve account in the form of cash and/or qualified securities. A carrying broker-dealer cannot make a withdrawal from the customer reserve account until the next computation and then only if the computation shows that the reserve requirement has decreased.
The carrying broker-dealer must make a deposit into the customer reserve bank account by 10:00 am of the second business day following the “as of” date of the new computation if the computation shows that the amount required to be on deposit in the customer reserve bank account is greater than the amount currently on deposit in the account.
If the computation shows the amount required to be on deposit in the customer reserve bank account is less than the amount currently on deposit in the account, the carrying broker-dealer can withdraw the difference.
A carrying broker-dealer also is required to make and maintain a record of each computation and permitted to offset customer credit items only with customer debit items.
Carrying broker-dealers also may carry PAB accounts—that is, accounts that hold proprietary securities and cash of other broker-dealers. Because broker-dealers are entitled to a pro rata share of customer property under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, Rules 15c3-3 and 15c3-3a require carrying broker-dealers to
The amount of net cash owed to PAB account holders is computed weekly as of the close of the last business day of the week.
The SEC is proposing amendments to Rule 15c3-3 to address a mismatch risk in funds owed and funds reserved under the rule. To illustrate the issue, the SEC noted that under a weekly computation schedule, carrying broker-dealers receive customer- and PAB-related cash inflows and that cash credited to customers and PAB account holders often is quickly reinvested into other instruments and/or subject to a sweep program (whether bank sweep or money market fund sweep).
These outflows generally reduce the amount of cash and/or qualified securities the broker-dealer needs to deposit into the customer or PAB reserve bank account. However, the SEC notes that carrying broker-dealers may also receive large cash inflows that are not deployed for or on behalf of the customers or PAB account holders prior to the next required customer and PAB reserve computations and deposits into the customer and PAB reserve bank accounts.
The SEC states that this may result in the value of the cash and/or qualified securities in the customer and PAB reserve bank accounts not equaling the net cash owed to customers and PAB account holders for a period of time.
This mismatch, according to the SEC, poses a risk to the carrying broker-dealer’s customers and PAB account holders if the carrying broker-dealer fails financially because it may be unable to meet its obligations to customers and PAB account holders.
To address this mismatch, the SEC would amend Rule 15c3-3 to add paragraph (e)(3)(i)(B) to the rule. In summary, the Proposal would implement the following:
While a number of broker-dealers already calculate their customer reserve and PAB reserve account computation requirement on a daily basis, a number of firms that would fall under the Proposal would have to undergo significant systems upgrades in order to meet the daily calculation requirements.
In addition, the potential increase in daily inflows and outflows of cash and qualified securities between broker-dealers and banks could further operational implications that may need more vetting.
In this respect, while supportive of the Proposal because of its narrow and tailored approach, Commissioner Peirce did highlight that the Proposal “urges commenters to review the Treasury clearing proposal to determine whether it is relevant to their comments on this release.”
To this end, she asks why that proposal is not being reopened and whether the proposed Rule 15c3-3 changes are likely not to have an effect on that clearing proposal. In any event, while the Proposal may not seem overtly controversial or complicated, there will be a back office operational build required of broker-dealers, and a relatively short time frame to build out the necessary systems when the $250 Million Threshold is met.
If you have any questions or would like more information on the issues discussed in this LawFlash, please contact any of the following: